Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where
kaih@khms.westfalen.de (Kai Henningsen) Wed, 29 September 2004 22:49 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA27664; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:49:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CCnOp-00053D-2K; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:58:16 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CCmiR-0004xb-Ty; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:14:27 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CCmX4-0001CP-Gs for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:02:42 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA21502 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:02:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from colo.khms.westfalen.de ([213.239.196.208] ident=Debian-exim) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CCmfA-0003cW-WD for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:11:06 -0400
Received: from khms.vpn ([10.172.192.2]:54489 helo=khms.westfalen.de) by colo.khms.westfalen.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1CCmU5-00062a-G9 for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:59:38 +0200
Received: from root (helo=khms.westfalen.de) by khms.westfalen.de with local-bsmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CCmTv-0007iw-Qy for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:59:27 +0200
Received: by khms.westfalen.de (CrossPoint v3.12d.kh14 R/C435); 29 Sep 2004 23:47:26 +0200
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:04:00 +0200
From: kaih@khms.westfalen.de
To: ietf@ietf.org
Message-ID: <9HoYk63mw-B@khms.westfalen.de>
In-Reply-To: <1207701419.20040922172208@gainesgroup.com>
X-Mailer: CrossPoint v3.12d.kh14 R/C435
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Organization: Organisation? Me?! Are you kidding?
References: <20040922003307.783E1A569C@newdev.harvard.edu> <530800000.1095864601@minbar.fac.cs.cmu.edu> <Pine.LNX.4.60.0409220901030.29741@npax.cavebear.com> <Pine.LNX.4.60.0409220901030.29741@npax.cavebear.com> <1207701419.20040922172208@gainesgroup.c
X-No-Junk-Mail: I do not want to get *any* junk mail.
Comment: Unsolicited commercial mail will incur an US$100 handling fee per received mail.
X-Fix-Your-Modem: +++ATS2=255&WO1
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 93238566e09e6e262849b4f805833007
Subject: Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9466e0365fc95844abaf7c3f15a05c7d
gene.gaines@gainesgroup.com (Gene Gaines) wrote on 22.09.04 in <1207701419.20040922172208@gainesgroup.com>: > It appears to me that IETF qualifies for this status easily as But we're not interested in this status for the IETF. We don't want to incorporate the IETF. What is under discussion is incorporating a separate organization whose mission is supporting the IETF. > a technical, memberhhip organization, not operated for private Neither the IETF, nor this possible new organization, has any (formal) membership. > I spoke briefly with a U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) expert > who told me informally that IETF appears to qualify easily for > non-profit, tax-exempt status. Well, given how far your model seems from the one discussed here, that seens worth nothing whatsoever. MfG Kai _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here Leslie Daigle
- Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on wher… Leslie Daigle
- Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here John C Klensin
- Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here Scott W Brim
- Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here Margaret Wasserman
- Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here Ted Hardie
- Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here Erik Huizer
- Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here scott bradner
- Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here scott bradner
- Scenario O (was: Re: Upcoming: further thoughts o… John C Klensin
- Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: further t… Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Tax excemption (Re: Scenario O (was: Re: Upcoming… Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: furth… John C Klensin
- Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: furth… Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: furth… Karl Auerbach
- Re: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on … Sam Hartman
- Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: furth… Gene Gaines
- Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: furth… Karl Auerbach
- Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: furth… Gene Gaines
- Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: furth… Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on … Tony Hain
- Re: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on … Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on … Margaret Wasserman
- Re: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on … Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here Kai Henningsen
- Scenario C (was: Scenario O) Kai Henningsen
- RE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on … Christian de Larrinaga
- Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: furth… Kai Henningsen
- Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: furth… Gene Gaines