Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets

Martin Rex <mrex@sap.com> Thu, 10 May 2012 17:32 UTC

Return-Path: <mrex@sap.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1A5A21F8526 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 May 2012 10:32:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.08
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.08 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.169, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s+wkby9Yc6pB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 May 2012 10:32:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpde01.sap-ag.de (smtpde01.sap-ag.de [155.56.68.170]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38B3321F84DD for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 May 2012 10:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sap.corp by smtpde01.sap-ag.de (26) with ESMTP id q4AHWRN4027298 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 10 May 2012 19:32:32 +0200 (MEST)
From: Martin Rex <mrex@sap.com>
Message-Id: <201205101732.q4AHWQnP028852@fs4113.wdf.sap.corp>
Subject: Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
To: melinda.shore@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 19:32:26 +0200
In-Reply-To: <4FABF241.3040801@gmail.com> from "Melinda Shore" at May 10, 12 08:52:17 am
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SAP: out
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: mrex@sap.com
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 17:32:45 -0000

Melinda Shore wrote:
> 
> On 5/10/12 5:04 AM, Martin Rex wrote:
> > Peter Sylvester wrote:
> >> On 05/10/2012 11:17 AM, David Morris wrote:
> >>> I object to the quantum change in ease of access and persistence of the
> >>> information. I see way too much aggregation of personal information and
> >>> don't think open-ness is justification for increasing that potential.
> >> +1
> > +1
> 
> I disagree rather strongly.  This is an open standards body with an open
> process, and I think if we're going to change that it needs to be as a
> result of a more general discussion rather than simply chipping away
> around the edges.


There has never been a need to actively broadcast these massive amounts
of personally identifiable information (PII), and I haven't seen any
convincing rationale for doing it now.

Whenever dealing with PII the most responsible action is to distribute
it only when a real need has been demonstrated.  When publishing information
on the internet, it is not possible to undo it, so it is better to err
on the safe side for PII.

-Martin