Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com> Wed, 25 February 2009 00:16 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26AF63A6B41 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:16:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.629
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.629 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.030, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZmhLkbUKy2Q7 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:16:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com (sj-iport-1.cisco.com [171.71.176.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69CC93A6925 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:16:28 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,262,1233532800"; d="scan'208";a="146913920"
Received: from sj-dkim-4.cisco.com ([171.71.179.196]) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 25 Feb 2009 00:16:48 +0000
Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com (sj-core-5.cisco.com [171.71.177.238]) by sj-dkim-4.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n1P0GmpW003034; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:16:48 -0800
Received: from [192.168.4.177] (rcdn-fluffy-8711.cisco.com [10.99.9.18]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n1P0GlcQ012724; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:16:47 GMT
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
To: David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0902131009460.25480@egate.xpasc.com>
Impp: xmpp:cullenfluffyjennings@jabber.org
Subject: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate
References: <20090213001531.2CFE46BE551@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <4994D366.5010206@gmail.com><Pine.LNX.4.64.0902121802050.25480@egate.xpasc.com> <4994DC20.2070107@es2eng.com> <BB56240F3A190F469C52A57138047A0301B8C882@xmb-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0902131009460.25480@egate.xpasc.com>
Message-Id: <1F37C3B8-ABF4-4193-B65F-DF4FD21D58E8@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:16:46 -0700
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=477; t=1235521008; x=1236385008; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim4002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=fluffy@cisco.com; z=From:=20Cullen=20Jennings=20<fluffy@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20Changes=20needed=20to=20Last=20Call=20b oilerplate |Sender:=20; bh=qg2PhrGEVr1hu98jSkNGsfyDMTcvpXYMUW2+H9LWzRk=; b=c9a0qKijQ8HhZcQz75tLSZDq6Lw1KO3Vkn3rVSCOSveEHhdnCMSfNs5X/K ESWLc/TpLG9Zj2JTLKxS8APGkKyBpQl7IllU5/uXqO/Sy7y+Jf4h2UTtRivT j80BV3c5qJ;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-4; header.From=fluffy@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim4002 verified; );
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:16:29 -0000

On Feb 13, 2009, at 11:15 AM, David Morris wrote:

> while providing the operational efficiency of collecting all  
> discussion in one place for actual analysis of last call

While there may be better ways of doing it, I'll note the IETF LC  
subject line is constructed to make it possible to find the LC  
comments. If you remove the draft name from subject line of any LC  
replies, you substantially reduce the odds of them being found and  
read by the IESG.