IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Try this: was Re: New proposal/New SOW comment period

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Wed, 11 September 2019 08:51 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B271120839 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 01:51:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=opendkim.org header.b=T8PIpxY4; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com header.b=JHtSZfgw
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1cqKQqqGBB6M for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 01:51:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.elandsys.com (mx.elandsys.com [162.213.2.210]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EE0E120838 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 01:51:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.115.178.124]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id x8B8pDno025835 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 11 Sep 2019 01:51:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1568191886; x=1568278286; bh=nW7Q1ec4Lo87s/ElCaAQ4OKpBR1RQrsPwWqi1MNrb4s=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=T8PIpxY4o3Fn2O9HpZrKpG/39Uo0OCFUzOcLzfIPOZueYR6A4wYwcocj/V9frGb+U X8qxOacHDddiAHFOHaBFggHIPohKEZc0LClQszyC9YLIU3L7TvzIwdJWeorldK/2kN 7B5ipnK1Ttsqx7EVp+hLH1CH11mb7E7evAYjXmB8=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1568191886; x=1568278286; i=@elandsys.com; bh=nW7Q1ec4Lo87s/ElCaAQ4OKpBR1RQrsPwWqi1MNrb4s=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=JHtSZfgw0ZiLw437vjPVV+vHc34oZPMjpcijbnHiEPzXYLxPPK96mCfBykjzRDHLH tfwGWneWpOeK/BTe8Ykg0takmIm98G3fWVTWVgjPO0DaX+mX+bfhsYp9hwAAeCuLPC QIQ4VhIQt4jmwQkDlvm4o85WiVBHonuw05mFNehs=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20190911013116.0b9b6e20@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 01:50:56 -0700
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Try this: was Re: New proposal/New SOW comment period
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <44cbe750-e030-69d7-54ba-5eaeccc5f512@gmail.com>
References: <ec715385-93ca-ddf0-f9b1-d0e4ae1666fe@nthpermutation.com> <CAL02cgTqDTXgG1bU1DGBkdQ7XwV=2ryJzQU1QD8yNba-7ngk3A@mail.gmail.com> <44cbe750-e030-69d7-54ba-5eaeccc5f512@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/JjMou-4Aq3jjq5Byii3FsUm3BEU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 08:51:30 -0000

Hi Brian,
At 01:38 PM 10-09-2019, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>Do we really need to worry about that? This is a time of change and 
>I don't think it matters if we deviate from the letter of a 
>7-year-old Informational document.

The document is an IAB RFC.  It discusses about a version of the RFC 
Editor Model, as viewed in 2012.  What is the purpose of the IAB 
members (listed in Section 7) approving what was written on that 
topic if nobody worries about what is written in the document?

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email