Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
Mallory Knodel <mallory@article19.org> Sat, 22 September 2018 07:43 UTC
Return-Path: <mallory@article19.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E028130DCB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 00:43:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yPXzSnx2thuy for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 00:43:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smarthost1.greenhost.nl (smarthost1.greenhost.nl [195.190.28.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B9BD130DF2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 00:43:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.greenhost.nl ([213.108.110.112]) by smarthost1.greenhost.nl with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <mallory@article19.org>) id 1g3cZP-0002fW-Qo; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 09:43:16 +0200
Subject: Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
To: lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <20180920233440.238CA20051DDE5@ary.qy> <5d3da769-5243-f6ee-35b2-d63f9e43b33a@cisco.com> <4c8aa4ce-b491-b816-9967-e723b8b3be03@digitaldissidents.org> <325538173.14441870.1537527705103@mail.yahoo.com> <6EC8B12E-0908-4AED-B2E4-6ADA37BF01DB@nohats.ca> <1275348340.14654769.1537539052249@mail.yahoo.com> <db02fca4-34d8-e30f-f494-a0fe342ac05a@article19.org> <1663509122.15011960.1537574110480@mail.yahoo.com>
From: Mallory Knodel <mallory@article19.org>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Autocrypt: addr=mallory@article19.org; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xsBNBEx0TWcBCAC8sirY3nlDnRwY6XWmsvZtM9kmEK6H8no3ZuQ723PKwHOddw1nOykh0in/ /QGRmwtyVzsfLh6/94UUZTn10oo+xGAfw2gf1on5IJTIiphykk732PNnUakVGWwHNKQquTVc kLrydUaFVMb89BAXqExBKlMg2ciEjzbYMCs3I/qZAZ0Wr5nF3RQS8O78elTNAgWTZ98yKTZV DlRoDpnvbfwtIPqnISoSjDEvEUBdpykvS3jHqlR1f6Mx6Xs97S5CORaer/0qTcDm0PAb1Z9l IhMsFl05tNt2FpgS4/RN8NyLasAQNOlScpTJbAfRuyyvRm1N8GLIL1KX+YYeLyqzhdhZABEB AAHNJU1hbGxvcnkgS25vZGVsIDxtYWxsb3J5QG1heWZpcnN0Lm9yZz7CwJgEEwECAEICGwMG CwkIBwMCBhUIAgkKCwQWAgMBAh4BAheAAhkBFiEE4+tj4GWjskC82bBxDDKicb08x4AFAlqo 9WUFCRAV234ACgkQDDKicb08x4DklAf+ODKRmP6C2MnBz6vL8N8l3vZJUqoRcYXTn3uTpT05 Wou87ZIZ/P/OV2/uOMKkczLQQydj5S8PxbLTeg+U5f/63hdy99ON+K2b4izg7Qasdl1SqXTH q1pmhbrcbLbVKDJ345fdEg7RuMnv4gd3EaT/yQa99zHy8JHaBKaPEUQAa65HTt2Sy2c6L6BA aMZx1TOZ9/cZ7L1gJyytJbEyvg/JLOatJEI4rewUWU2TMSGJijwjAUBagwDPWyxpz+vXdKsD tqRTpY4xvXaeUQo0QXf0c5j1Gcglzv7ywZcyz1MGD1aLS9/CqeB3I4EMbvH/33LS3jNkfKbV XOTSjmo7l22CNc7ATQRMdE1nAQgA4mpP2LjFuAW2li9FPbDYOMzt0MtThXsnvHyY0fDv8FlU qnKgPrMY80VHntnxwqepFS3ncunVX4ipq+fadta+LHpTnbJSmlphBrc9qGJxqcjwf4yo35Xh OXCJFwnaoAwIX237lXRe4Xh6X4VMuJt8jiZdvgpbk/whvQH2grcq8KjCcy1iuL5pBl8ZwYG/ dphitFhQdqEcnc/krIqG4KQgKiUi3K/GR0OeEmw/cscWD7/CLEo7eHiaGQhSOyDQbM+Iu2o/ 6uMXMUPsYlMMqgmVL68zMacO3PE17jx0rQ8oZ7CpBY8YZWOWrzXrtFT8JO9guuCPsvd4KT6y 97y9LRJlPQARAQABwsB8BBgBAgAmAhsMFiEE4+tj4GWjskC82bBxDDKicb08x4AFAlqo9WYF CRAV238ACgkQDDKicb08x4DU4QgAmlyBlFhfU0jpkbyD3HQ+3CJqWdBT422pVIrj3qNT2ehy fWO66Muidmd4Y279uV3p3TQEJOQvnV7FVAC9+bI7AdBy00BAjHgJ5eSQZxKTXUoeeBAsTZHN /HaHewjYWHMvCuuzir/Wt3A6Cehh8gp9I/Vg+oL3dTldVqqgZLgnA83bT/R8fI/e85LDlpdx KJ0+uy/grg3AbH7LUUrmMIC2iO8mQWYuNlizsUZLFvJhCAU2c5l8B5mv2BoWFhL+l7mmNcdF bwBFXon7Ea1jkCnbWVxtXkPYkcuWuMSTJswn9HhZVJWjUonKqUZKAb9PxRzC9crZ+X14tQT3 iJt2a4ZM4w==
Message-ID: <f710366f-ff12-ce70-5b42-0919e6173c33@article19.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2018 10:43:13 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1663509122.15011960.1537574110480@mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Scanned: by clamav at smarthost1.samage.net
X-Scan-Signature: cba2eb4d83bbdf72d3179b19870a415b
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/JlKVZiE0S6Zdxp1mOHEDjH1vrLM>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2018 07:43:20 -0000
Hi, Disregard the subject, please. But the rest of the message was meant to land in your inboxes and the ietf@ archives. -Mallory On 22/09/2018 02:55, lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk wrote: > Mallory, > > > judging by the subject line, you may not have intended to send this to > the list in its current form, and I'm a bit puzzled as to who you're > asking permission of. Do you want that particular mail to be disregarded? > > > (as previously noted, when you hear 'folks', prepare to be patronised by > an American. it's a trigger word... language matters!) > > > Lloyd Wood > lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk > > On Saturday, September 22, 2018, 3:46 am, Mallory Knodel > <mallory@article19.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > New co-chair of HRPC here. > > First, I'd like to thank folks who are defending the existence of our > research group. And I'd like to deeply appreciate those throughout this > long thread here, and in HRPC, who are reading and responding, even > though talking about personal and social issues of oppression can be > emotionally taxing. I know that I am emotionally exhausted by it. > > I couldn't agree more with everything that Avri said. > > For my contribution in this thread, I want to address Eliot Lear, > > > the co-chair has attempted to stifle debate > > I will admit that based on my experience and expertise that I disagree > with nearly everything that he has said in this discussion. But it has > not been my intention to "stifle debate". > > In one response I wrote, > > > I'm going to stop you right there. > > Of course I didn't actually stop him as he had pre-synchronously written > his message. I also didn't stop him from writing subsequent messages nor > did I want to. Apologies, Eliot. It was nothing more than a debate > gimmick and turn of phrase, but language matters! I won't use it again. > > I've drafted a document to collect the various arguments and elements. > Some of which Neils has just shared back to the thread at Alissa's > suggestion. I hope to share that soon. > > This debate, at least in part, might be new to the IETF but it is not > new to communities of technologists. I've been part of some of these > communities and I'm glad the debate is happening here, as difficult as > it might be. > > With thanks, > -Mallory > > On 21/09/2018 17:10, Lloyd Wood wrote: > > Paul > > > > "The arguments so far (from you and John Levine) have been > > that since HRPC didn’t attain world peace and > > universal human rights, it should be closed down." > > > > I can see where John suggested that. > > > > But where did I suggest or endorse that idea? > > > > I suspect you're confusing skepticism for stifling dissent. > > And that you're confusing me with Eliot Lear. > > > > (on my mail agent behaviour, I'm suspecting the mail agent.) > > > > L. > > > > Lloyd Wood lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk <mailto:lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk> > http://about.me/lloydwood > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:* Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca <mailto:paul@nohats.ca>> > > *To:* Lloyd Wood <lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk > <mailto:lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk>> > > *Cc:* "ietf@ietf.org <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>" <ietf@ietf.org > <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>> > > *Sent:* Friday, 21 September 2018, 23:38 > > *Subject:* Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and offensive > > terminology in RFCs > > > > > > > >> On Sep 21, 2018, at 07:01, Lloyd Wood > > <lloyd.wood=40yahoo.co.uk@dmarc.ietf.org > <mailto:40yahoo.co.uk@dmarc.ietf.org> > > <mailto:40yahoo.co.uk@dmarc.ietf.org > <mailto:40yahoo.co.uk@dmarc.ietf.org>>> wrote: > >> > >> Niels, > >> > >> you are surprised about this conversation here and now on HPRC, > >> despite you being the very person who initiated this conversation > >> introducing the topic of HPRC to the main list? > > > > Niels introduced a topic from HPRC that he thought warranted > discussion > > outside of HPRC. Since HPRC per definition is about ALL of IETF > > considering the impact of IETF protocols on human rights, that is > > appropriate and expected output of the group. > > > > What Niels was surprised about was some people’s reaction to close > down > > HPRC, and I concur with Niels’ surprise. The arguments so far > (from you > > and John Levine) have been that since HRPC didn’t attain world > peace and > > universal human rights, it should be closed down. It fails to > understand > > the groups goal. If that kind of measuring is used, the Security Area > > and IPv6 groups should have been closed down years ago. > > > >> And you complain > >> about someone expressing a contrary and dissenting position while > >> emailing from **digitaldissidents**..org? Irony much? > > > > Niels is not complaining, you are. And this attack doesn’t belong on > > this list. > > > >> (I'd also like to know why my replies to you aren't cc'ing the > >> list by default; that does look like an attempt to stifle debate, > >> but I don't see the expected Reply-To: in headers.) > > > > And now you seem to imply the ietf@ietf.org <mailto:ietf@ietf.org> > <mailto:ietf@ietf.org <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>> list > > > settings are somehow Niels’ fault. If you want to complain about > these, > > a new thread devoid of HRPC discussion, just discussions this > > particular’s list settings would be the appropriate way to raise > this as > > an issue to discuss.. > > > > > >> remember: social justice warriors have never been to war. > > > > > > You are trying to prove that you “mastered” flame baiting? > > > > I guess if anything, you showed that IETF has a lot of work to do to > > become more inclusive and considerate, and if we really need to > discuss > > whether HRPC should be closed down or not (I don’t think we do) than > > your behavior shows the need to keep it open. > > > > Paul > > > > > > > > -- > Mallory Knodel > Head of Digital :: article19.org > gpg fingerprint :: E3EB 63E0 65A3 B240 BCD9 B071 0C32 A271 BD3C C780 > > -- Mallory Knodel Head of Digital :: article19.org gpg fingerprint :: E3EB 63E0 65A3 B240 BCD9 B071 0C32 A271 BD3C C780
- Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Niels ten Oever
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Riccardo Bernardini
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Stewart Bryant
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Petr Špaček
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Niels ten Oever
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Dave Cridland
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Loa Andersson
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Mukund Sivaraman
- SV: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Anne-Marie Eklund-Löwinder
- RE: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Roberta Maglione (robmgl)
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Ole Troan
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Michal Krsek
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Tony Finch
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Job Snijders
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Anton Ivanov
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Anton Ivanov
- RE: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Adrian Farrel
- Re: SV: Diversity and offensive terminology in RF… Jaap Akkerhuis
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Toerless Eckert
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs lloyd.wood
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Carsten Bormann
- Re: SV: Diversity and offensive terminology in RF… lloyd.wood
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Paul Wouters
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Paul Wouters
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs lloyd.wood
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Toerless Eckert
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Stephan Wenger
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Mark Nottingham
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Stephen Farrell
- RE: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs John E Drake
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Melinda Shore
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Dick Franks
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs ned+ietf
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Toerless Eckert
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Melinda Shore
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Melinda Shore
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Paul Hoffman
- Re: SV: Diversity and offensive terminology in RF… Evan Hunt
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Toerless Eckert
- ""Man-in-the-middle""? <was, Re: SV: Diversity an… Charlie Perkins
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Evan Hunt
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Melinda Shore
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Evan Hunt
- Re: SV: Diversity and offensive terminology in RF… Michael StJohns
- Re: ""Man-in-the-middle""? <was, Re: SV: Diversit… Dave Aronson
- Re: SV: Diversity and offensive terminology in RF… Heather Flanagan
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Mark Nottingham
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Heather Flanagan
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Evan Hunt
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Carsten Bormann
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Ted Lemon
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Toerless Eckert
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Evan Hunt
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Carsten Bormann
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs John C Klensin
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Carsten Bormann
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Toerless Eckert
- Re: SV: Diversity and offensive terminology in RF… Anton Ivanov
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Yoav Nir
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Kyle Rose
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Carsten Bormann
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Dave Cridland
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Ted Lemon
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and of… John Levine
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Toerless Eckert
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Ted Lemon
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Mark Rousell
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and of… Mark Rousell
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and of… Melinda Shore
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Alia Atlas
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and of… Allison Mankin
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Mark Rousell
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Mark Rousell
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Mark Rousell
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Lloyd Wood
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Lloyd Wood
- On-path attackers (Was: Re: Diversity and offensi… Jari Arkko
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and of… Eliot Lear
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and of… Niels ten Oever
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and of… Lloyd Wood
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Eliot Lear
- Re: On-path attackers (Was: Re: Diversity and off… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Alissa Cooper
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and of… Paul Wouters
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and of… Ted Lemon
- Re: On-path attackers (Was: Re: Diversity and off… Donald Eastlake
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and of… Lloyd Wood
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Niels ten Oever
- Re: On-path attackers (Was: Re: Diversity and off… Toerless Eckert
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Ted Lemon
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Anton Ivanov
- Re: On-path attackers (Was: Re: Diversity and off… Ted Lemon
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and of… John R Levine
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Paul Wouters
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Eliot Lear
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Toerless Eckert
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Nico Williams
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and of… Avri
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Dave Cridland
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and of… John Levine
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and of… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and of… Allison Mankin
- Tell me if I should send this Re: why exactly is … Mallory Knodel
- Mallory-in-the-middle attacks (Re: SV: Diversity … Nico Williams
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Nico Williams
- Re: On-path attackers (Was: Re: Diversity and off… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Glenn Deen
- Re: Mallory-in-the-middle attacks (Re: SV: Divers… Nico Williams
- Re: Tell me if I should send this Re: why exactly… lloyd.wood
- Re: Mallory-in-the-middle attacks (Re: SV: Divers… Mallory Knodel
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and of… Mallory Knodel
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and of… S Moonesamy
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and of… Mallory Knodel