Re: draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay unreasonably stuck on IPR?

S Moonesamy <> Tue, 08 November 2016 18:43 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B08AB1296D8; Tue, 8 Nov 2016 10:43:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.287
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.287 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.b=HWnKowaK; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.b=OJRbweoL
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kXHOzcO4ZWCK; Tue, 8 Nov 2016 10:43:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61F6C129D8F; Tue, 8 Nov 2016 10:43:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ([]) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uA8IgtAS028104 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 8 Nov 2016 10:43:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=mail2010; t=1478630589; x=1478716989; bh=HBdR1Kd99FwjxkrGfkccTwX7UaaC37uK1xcKUPLZfHQ=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=HWnKowaKFdUT5HlFrwQuBvdaH8NwrcaDwfmmtaIz+L4GUmhxQl2WWyJOrra1SSQDN xnZVyNrSJAD+J2oBvwiJTIhKG7CsEONkhY2JB7u9VoaYQFyNECKzU6wB5Obyz754bk t0nF6c/bzUrJHZmBSnHNIKWkmszXLDCj0ja1I4ks=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=mail; t=1478630589; x=1478716989;; bh=HBdR1Kd99FwjxkrGfkccTwX7UaaC37uK1xcKUPLZfHQ=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=OJRbweoLi1XrpTy5URHdd/0Kn3bC3kZYazgqYs6QOec2OUzXtTT4t73dclwjDqbj+ 3HF5lF7XddmR9c2gLnONELfb1FMb/DdH2hmhVJxxSFPhIxzd8ddtZZrz03S4j/WQLB r0o7tvQ5ZiBjIpNr1dYTYtHyORHCQB4Lz7shb29w=
Message-Id: <>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2016 10:40:59 -0800
To: Job Snijders <>,
From: S Moonesamy <>
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay unreasonably stuck on IPR?
In-Reply-To: <20161108144742.GH2473@Hanna.local>
References: <20161108144742.GH2473@Hanna.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2016 18:43:14 -0000

Hi Job,
At 06:47 08-11-2016, Job Snijders wrote:
>Since the EPPEXT Working Group has been concluded and evolved into
>regext, I'm reaching out to the bigger group about a document that
>somehow is stuck.

Did the authors or Working Group address the second part of the DISCUSS?

S. Moonesamy

P.S. There may have been a communication breakdown as the draft 
started in EPPEXT which no longer exists.  There was also some 
personnel changes along the way.