Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists

Theodore Ts'o <> Sat, 12 April 2014 23:02 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D2901A0257 for <>; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 16:02:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.164
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.164 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TTex6qmgFFb0 for <>; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 16:02:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2600:3c02::f03c:91ff:fe96:be03]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C3EC1A0214 for <>; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 16:02:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from root ( by with local-esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <>) id 1WZ6vx-0004ku-Du; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 23:02:01 +0000
Received: by (Postfix, from userid 15806) id 9D1E658026D; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 19:02:00 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=mail; t=1397343720; bh=8SE/M45RhUNX5nTTIIO64OW2rSQo0qA32HHOUO3Mxcg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=sSnl/k758Lna4q/aD04DrMBj84SGRTD80tllYitrafbvFPh189CsnuY0fZj9FOEl9 yvMNoBl2x6EnFyQVPcabT2XPT1RAhfbXGXht723d8Ak5w/xPHOenhZU/Lse+5YA4/K I9ZgMJkyz696u2exddwDj2SBgyulFDo4NiSvrlRs=
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 19:02:00 -0400
From: Theodore Ts'o <>
To: Miles Fidelman <>
Subject: Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 23:02:06 -0000

On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 03:56:14PM -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> We (really I) support perhaps 2 dozen small email lists, for a bunch of
> community groups (PTOs, churches, neighborhood groups) - mostly the legacy
> of previously running a small hosting firm, and still having the machines
> sitting in a data center.  The kinds of groups with lots of non-technical
> users who have email accounts on Yahoo, hotmail, AOL, Comcast, and such.
> The lists range in size from tiny (5 person boards of directors) to maybe
> 1000 (high school parents).

Why don't you just respond by sending an e-mail to each of the
affected users, telling them that they will unfortunately no longer be
able to participate in the mailing list due to the choices of their
mail provider, and that if they want to continue to receiving e-mail,
to consider setting up new e-mail account with some other provider
such as gmail -- and then cc on the message.

That's how I plan to deal with things....

					- Ted