Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E602B1A010D for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 23:34:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sN4ucL1GcUVq for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 23:34:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mork.alvestrand.no (mork.alvestrand.no [IPv6:2001:700:1:2::117]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB6BE1A00FA for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 23:34:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FC567C06F8 for ; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 08:34:21 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at alvestrand.no Received: from mork.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mork.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 67MJ6oUW-d3y for ; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 08:34:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:2001:67c:370:176:e190:20fd:9b5e:945d] (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:370:176:e190:20fd:9b5e:945d]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 32FB37C052A for ; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 08:34:20 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <55AB44EB.8000602@alvestrand.no> Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 08:34:19 +0200 From: Harald Alvestrand User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ietf@ietf.org Subject: Re: Non-Terminal Room References: <3F72F273-A420-4769-8E26-53DBE89B0607@isc.org> <55AAB947.2050100@restena.lu> <423EDF6E7415B588A95C0135@P5> <55AAD106.9010702@nominum.com> In-Reply-To: <55AAD106.9010702@nominum.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF-Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 06:34:23 -0000 On 07/19/2015 12:19 AM, Ted Lemon wrote: > On 07/18/2015 04:54 PM, Warren Kumari wrote: >> No, it is simply always the very last room in the line.. > Indeed, if you don't have a terminal room, you get ringing, which > corrupts packets and leads to bad latency. > /me briefly considers whether "ringing" can be applied to the vision of IETF oldtimers restlessly pacing back and forth in the corridor looking for the terminal room.... -- Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark.