Re: Hotel situation

Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org> Sun, 10 January 2016 05:32 UTC

Return-Path: <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D29D1A00C0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 21:32:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Quarantine-ID: <NenQzLZFVMNu>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "MIME-Version"
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NenQzLZFVMNu for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 21:32:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from turing.pensive.org (turing.pensive.org [99.111.97.161]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C741A00BF; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 21:32:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [99.111.97.136] (99.111.97.161) by turing.pensive.org with ESMTP (EIMS X 3.3.9); Sat, 9 Jan 2016 21:32:41 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p06240603d2b79cf9d6eb@[99.111.97.136]>
In-Reply-To: <599402171.3997115.1452371113558.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
References: <p06240605d2b600eb4317@[99.111.97.136]> <599402171.3997115.1452371113558.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
X-Mailer: Eudora for Mac OS X
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2016 21:32:37 -0800
To: Lloyd Wood <lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk>, Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org>, Ole Jacobsen <olejacobsen@me.com>, IETF Discussion List <ietf@ietf.org>
From: Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org>
Subject: Re: Hotel situation
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/JrrydEmiJ4SBBFQz-Xaq1MRBWac>
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 05:32:44 -0000

At 8:25 PM +0000 1/9/16, Lloyd Wood wrote:

>  blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; 
> border-left:1px #715FFA solid !important; padding-left:1ex 
> !important; background-color:white !important; } and then there was 
> that time physicists met in Las Vegas and the town told them never 
> to return.
>
>
>  <>http://physicsbuzz.physicscentral.com/2015/09/one-winning-move.html
>
>
>  L.
>
>
>  the only winning move is not to bet on -00.


Amusing story, although I expect that, were the IETF to try and 
emulate this, the hotel would find it one of their most profitable 
weeks.  Likely the bar tabs alone would fund the entire hotel 
operation, with gambling winnings providing pure gravy.


>
>
>  On Saturday, January 9, 2016, 11:14 AM, Randall Gellens 
> <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org> wrote:
>
>  At 8:19 AM -<tel:0800%201/5/16>0800 1/5/16, Ole Jacobsen wrote:
>
>
>>   Las Vegas would clearly win, but I have a strong impression that
>>   many of our attendees would object to going there. (It also happens
>>   to be a "tourist destination" for reasons that kind of escapes
>>   me, but that's yet another discussion).
>
>
>  I'd be very upset if we started meeting in perhaps the last remaining
>  all-smoking-all-the-time location in the U.S. or Canada.
>
>  --
>  Randall Gellens
>  Opinions are personal;    facts are suspect;    I speak for myself only
>  -------------- Randomly selected tag: ---------------
>  In Germany they came first for the Communists, and I didn't speak up
>  because I wasn't a Communist.  Then they came for the Jews, and I
>  didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew.  They came for the trade
>  unionists, I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist.  Then
>  they came for Catholics, and I didn't speak up because I was a
>  Protestant.  Then they came for me, and by that time no one was left
>  to speak up.                                        --Martin Niemoell


-- 
Randall Gellens
Opinions are personal;    facts are suspect;    I speak for myself only
-------------- Randomly selected tag: ---------------
Change is inevitable, except from a vending machine.