Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV
Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Sun, 07 December 2014 00:01 UTC
Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 714E51A1BC6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Dec 2014 16:01:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cqxA3CzaDZyG for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Dec 2014 16:01:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [198.180.150.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D7F51A1BC5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Dec 2014 16:01:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1XxPHb-0006fz-Ks; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 00:01:03 +0000
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 09:01:02 +0900
Message-ID: <m2tx18e3b5.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
Subject: Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV
In-Reply-To: <20141206235836.92E062509740@rock.dv.isc.org>
References: <CAMm+Lwj+KjTVka1M7O+tsp76C_OCGR0bWKH_k5UrZXSYZrF+GA@mail.gmail.com> <20141206213552.2777C2508A06@rock.dv.isc.org> <m24mt8fmkk.wl%randy@psg.com> <20141206235836.92E062509740@rock.dv.isc.org>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/JvM1054b9DQU0n5aHFEASrslGM4
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 00:01:06 -0000
>>> DNS64 is not the only solution for a ISP to go IPv6 only. >> 64 was motivated by the need for a 6-only *enterprise* > > And DNS64 requires NAT in the core and a fork lift upgrade of the > CPE to support IPv6. no. let's try reading what i said again. i requires nat at the edge of the V6-ONLY ENTERPRISE. considering the enterprise is v6-only and trying to talk to a v4 world, address translation is inevitable. randy
- DNS64, DANE and DPRIV Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV Mark Andrews
- Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV Ted Lemon
- Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV Randy Bush
- Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV Mark Andrews
- Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV Randy Bush
- Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV Mark Andrews
- Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV Randy Bush
- Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV Andrew Sullivan
- Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV Michael Richardson
- Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV Andrew Sullivan
- Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV Phillip Hallam-Baker