IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: postscript vs PDF, Call for Community Feedback: Retiring IETF FTP Service

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Sat, 28 November 2020 22:52 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4EDC3A11D1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 14:52:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.919
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.919 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RZxf-AWVHhSQ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 14:52:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7085F3A114C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 14:52:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p548dce71.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.206.113]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Ck6FC6tKQzyQH; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 23:51:59 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
Subject: Re: postscript vs PDF, Call for Community Feedback: Retiring IETF FTP Service
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <20201128221735.7954A2865CCB@ary.qy>
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2020 23:51:59 +0100
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>, john-ietf@jck.com
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 628296719.147094-b9a4fec8e058d21fc24ef9739b477203
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5612D8D1-8E03-4C3E-8101-EB4B08999112@tzi.org>
References: <20201128221735.7954A2865CCB@ary.qy>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Jwe_oXHhRjuJyu2g_LJ3pzdVDRI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2020 22:52:05 -0000

On 2020-11-28, at 23:17, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
> 
> Even ASCII has its bitrot aspects. 

As does the way we interpret certain characters from ASCII that haven’t changed in the mid-1960s...

https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/ucs/quotes.html

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email