Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-reference-model-06

Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com> Mon, 20 August 2018 02:10 UTC

Return-Path: <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 131A1130E9B; Sun, 19 Aug 2018 19:10:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
To: ops-dir@ietf.org
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, anima@ietf.org, draft-ietf-anima-reference-model.all@ietf.org
Subject: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-reference-model-06
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.83.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <153473105603.21205.6247870191811433257@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2018 19:10:56 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Jwwv5Mm2JWFIz_6sq-bjCGki0WU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 02:10:56 -0000

Reviewer: Tianran Zhou
Review result: Ready

I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of
the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included
in AD reviews during the IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs should
treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

I did not see any special operational or network management related issue. This
document is clear to me and is ready for publication.

By the way, do you think "MRACL" in this document need a reference or expansion?

Cheers,
Tianran