IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: WG Review: Stay Home Meet Only Online (shmoo)

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Wed, 08 July 2020 11:28 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ACFE3A084A; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 04:28:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.697
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.697 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kAWzyzvuvTMC; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 04:28:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.elandsys.com (mx.elandsys.com [162.213.2.210]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A623A0848; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 04:28:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.115.201.122]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id 068BS739026118 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 8 Jul 2020 04:28:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1594207700; x=1594294100; i=@elandsys.com; bh=b16Qk9wqmRZMBEz6uT/oURvpB6Zs0fIl/AA5XV4KcwI=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=z7xa9xHZsQ6BhVCwpTbLVXwmJHze0iYffchmJlYC3CTcCZ0E/h3Benpd+akFDmSU9 9cxs6svDjZuYVYhH/2k6o6vM+QhdnDYFSz0VpkQqyFU191O8N2G5pH6F0cwV+a3hIP T6DydFS6J7k2lACpHfyXUy7Vi0DpOn1btdyprCm4=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20200708035438.11253038@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2020 04:27:25 -0700
To: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, ietf@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: WG Review: Stay Home Meet Only Online (shmoo)
Cc: iesg@ietf.org, iab@iab.org
In-Reply-To: <07A3985F-1FB0-4F88-8651-249F443144EA@kuehlewind.net>
References: <159318840162.4951.12569119165623562334@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200627023025.0b145350@elandnews.com> <07A3985F-1FB0-4F88-8651-249F443144EA@kuehlewind.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/JyNIKQha3tLxP4kWjKhzsbIIbWg>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2020 11:28:23 -0000

Hi Mirja,
At 03:23 AM 08-07-2020, Mirja Kuehlewind wrote:
>On this point:

[snip]

>IAB members can review proposed charters during 
>community review process but there is no formal 
>step for the IAB to review all proposed 
>charters. I'm not sure why you may think this is 
>especially needed in this case given meeting 
>planning lies in responsibility of the IESG (or 
>LCC with respect to financial and contractual aspects)…?

The theory is that IAB advises the IESG on the 
chartering of new working groups.  I don't know 
how it works in practice as I did enquired about 
it until a week or so ago.  The point of the 
question was to ascertain that the IAB is aware of the proposed charter.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email