Re: "professional" in an IETF context

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Mon, 01 November 2021 19:48 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5772F3A2E02 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 12:48:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.429
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.429 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-3.33, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i9KozA5OSn5r for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 12:48:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x530.google.com (mail-pg1-x530.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::530]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95BB83A2DFF for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 12:48:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x530.google.com with SMTP id t7so18093301pgl.9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 12:48:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PoCD72jdmtaNxgEvbziioyzKBsjLIcgWWgWIZYBZ6Qo=; b=K5gQ7Se1OTl8BS9G6TBkTrIJtN/DaA/zgFvqnd8q9l+q71jCPkdGC3OiG7/Q8Ssmoj z5ANAQpxdumBWWpMzPihl8HwNopyz3tlPjs479W02F6HpZ8mH1LBLn7X1xS6mvdqVuei EpC60awUEJnC0RDQxRqFLjDihJeMn7Dazi0qmfOhnQFmhcFMBntbqOOYFM5YpVwx9iMq yQWOCl1aqj9/fzd+FaoPh9vOtgpG0y4eXlYmlU3YXm569HY51ejg+7wGKabrSZXtBHRd xcahjkFra05dZrVw8hZbDWWFRAKKs+/YsrmavmCiHFqAZtQ2Ik4qTf9Uf0hBI+1YR41a cn/A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=PoCD72jdmtaNxgEvbziioyzKBsjLIcgWWgWIZYBZ6Qo=; b=M1Al2DLuEgHzQA7H6v+Zb94r4jAGqf8j2PT4WjajLatqoTXjWwI//T5Fumfucrf9C4 q8xzaQ2xeORvy/kERMcpbicY1PquTrnKnT6LnCJb42Z8UW1faWXhs1SYvAYqqS0WvIvA 1e175A+QPgw1ahkzI2ABbp/AMKIwqxuvV4hnCgiuY5EtUUYJarU37dgcbuRweFMnmkX9 lkJ/RElykRg5rxOuF6jCdDnxew8BmEJDaOflF5IoJkJtMWnLkLaBkOgZcCDp6E+yTk1Z Im5XRbTT0qbuF/308xbMutqm6AOtp5VqjD0RDMAAOLcYU8EdNVImAnHTkuUi/w6xAXTm DrrQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530pfJB9AUWkmlieBouoN1voKKUF8g/n/hwDXFbnKEF4yhdbmpfR Am1/GrR1MK53uP4NF6JbJBbrfsaaknrnFg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxOPJiCipV4cqW1pga3PSH0hQ/LDzwfxBMZdGI/C/sQfMQj1m11PpTsC6ZIX1YkhIB0i58tUw==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:1309:b0:44d:4d1e:c930 with SMTP id j9-20020a056a00130900b0044d4d1ec930mr30800820pfu.65.1635796091538; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 12:48:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e003:102d:e801:80b2:5c79:2266:e431? ([2406:e003:102d:e801:80b2:5c79:2266:e431]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s69sm3091903pgc.43.2021.11.01.12.48.09 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 01 Nov 2021 12:48:10 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: "professional" in an IETF context
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <8F4B97EA-665F-4A59-B99D-791B4AB9F2F7@yahoo.co.uk> <746C1453-FFB0-46E5-ABF2-8630DC23B959@network-heretics.com> <c3e9fe1b-8e48-a364-9e25-4084dac70889@meetinghouse.net> <3a6bf8ad-5492-0942-a451-6317e8a93705@network-heretics.com> <3e685576-a230-a7c4-f371-d66a55aa820d@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <7a087707-499f-e3bf-8701-1a58930a8a22@meetinghouse.net> <4ec32d7a-a17b-635b-91bc-4152313d6800@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <885e62bf-7d6a-4501-a48a-e7c2cbf20382@joelhalpern.com> <e59adb61-a55c-7f5f-a60a-40bf186c139d@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <CAC8QAceMSrfkqGTYcMNr3JargO3gxJqTaEyf02LGHd-KVeUDHw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <6286da3e-2beb-9556-089a-2e1951573b1e@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2021 08:48:06 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAC8QAceMSrfkqGTYcMNr3JargO3gxJqTaEyf02LGHd-KVeUDHw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/JzF7MUgvdBAz1LsLlA-WK_00D2g>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2021 19:48:17 -0000

Somebody whose email never reaches my inbox alledgedly said:

>       > IPv6 with unnecessarily lengthy 16B addresses without valid
>       > technical reasoning only to make network operations prohibitively
>       > painful is a garbage protocol.

Apart from its incivility, this sentence is factually untrue. The address
length was 8 bytes in the early design of what became IPv6, which was of
course essential to overcome the main limitation of IPv4. It was expanded
to 16 bytes when the value of an interface identifier in addition to
a routeable prefix was considered. That idea was based on existing
practice in several non-IP network technologies, and on the IPng
requirements process. In other words, on technical reasoning and on
running code.

Professionalism includes factual accuracy.

    Brian