Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?

[Keith Moore <[e-mail]>]

>> Many, many working groups have looked at the problems associated with 
>> relative names and determined that they're not acceptable.  It's a 
>> "bug" that relative names are forbidden in these apps, nor that the 
>> final "." is implicit and in many cases disallowed.  These are 
>> carefully considered design features.  (for instance, forbidding the 
>> final "." makes it simpler to compare domain names for equivalence.)
> 
> It's nonsensical for an application to decide that relative names are 
> unacceptable, but to require users to input names as relative.

it's nonsensical for you to unilaterally declare that such names are 
relative, when well over two decades of practice indicates otherwise.

(and remember, some of these apps predate DNS and the whole notion of 
relative names)

it's almost as if the very concept of relative names in DNS is itself a 
bug - especially if you insist that handling of DNS names be absolutely 
uniform from one app to the next.  IMHO they cause far more problems 
than they're worth.

Keith
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf