Level of consultation (Re: a note about the scenarios)

Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Mon, 27 September 2004 02:48 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA14941; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 22:48:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CBlgl-0004Oh-Ir; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 22:56:31 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CBlXF-0005ye-O0; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 22:46:41 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CBlOt-0005AH-3C for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 22:38:03 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA14389 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 22:38:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([158.38.152.233]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CBlWP-0004Dm-0G for ietf@ietf.org; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 22:45:50 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D21561BFD; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 04:37:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03232-05; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 04:37:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from halvestr-w2k02.emea.cisco.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id D011661BD8; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 04:37:22 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 20:30:49 +0100
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Message-ID: <5D039D1046247F27481DAADE@B50854F0A9192E8EC6CDA126>
In-Reply-To: <2B581B61B043D598B8600A2A@scan.jck.com>
References: <0KNHTWZygPYF.G9ymhZVg@mail.mobiili.net> <2B581B61B043D598B8600A2A@scan.jck.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.5 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 8b431ad66d60be2d47c7bfeb879db82c
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Level of consultation (Re: a note about the scenarios)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 82c9bddb247d9ba4471160a9a865a5f3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

John,

picking on one of your topics as usual:

--On 24. september 2004 16:01 -0400 John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> 
wrote:

> (5) Has there been as much transparency and efforts to inform
> and educate the community about this process as it requires, as
> the traditions of the IETF dictate, and as the community has
> been promised?
>
> While there is a need for confidentiality about some things, I
> believe the community is entitled to know what topics have been
> singled out for discussion in confidence.  More generally, I
> think the answers to the above questions are "no", "no", and
> "no", partially because I don't believe the community ever
> authorized the IAB and IESG to go off on this adventure (that
> position differs very significantly from one of Harald's
> "obvious" positions which, if read carefully, implies the right
> and responsibility of the IETF and IAB Chairs to make a decision
> on these issues and implement it with little consultation of the
> IAB and IESG and very little consultation with the community.

My impression of the average impression of the level of consultation both 
within the IESG and IAB and outside it is better represented by Fred 
Templin's follow-up:

> Maybe I'm wrong, but I get the sense that the general populous has been
> and is continuing to get snowed under with way too much verbiage on this
> subject to derive any kind of an informed opinion. Any ideas on how it
> can  all be distilled into a paragraph or two?

I'm afraid I haven't found the magic paragraphs.

One possible reason why I've been so often charged with keeping secrets may 
be that people are secretly hoping that I have a grand secret plan that 
will solve everything in my back pocket, and am just waiting for the right 
moment to pull it out.... I am sorry - I don't have the plan. What you see 
is what there is, give or take a relatively small delta.

And - while I don't think John really means that - what I could read into 
John's remark as the extreme position is that NOBODY could take a decision 
to "go off on this adventure" - we just have to let the IETF go to hell in 
a handbasket, and let the IETF community reach consensus that this was a 
sad result.

Sorry - I'd rather be hanged for trying.

                     Harald


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf