Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)

"Scott Lawrence" <scott.lawrence@nortel.com> Mon, 30 November 2009 20:58 UTC

Return-Path: <scott.lawrence@nortel.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD913A699E for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:58:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YLbnZNroLtw4 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:58:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zcars04e.nortel.com (zcars04e.nortel.com [47.129.242.56]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 964243A693C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:58:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zrtphxs1.corp.nortel.com (casmtp.ca.nortel.com [47.140.202.46]) by zcars04e.nortel.com (Switch-2.2.0/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id nAUKwMn15845; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:58:23 GMT
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([47.17.25.99]) by zrtphxs1.corp.nortel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:58:22 -0500
Subject: Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
From: Scott Lawrence <scott.lawrence@nortel.com>
To: Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org>
In-Reply-To: <871vjfoq9r.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org>
References: <487AB12E-FD4A-4AD5-8641-17B4B64C6F8F@cisco.com> <4B04A9C5.6060904@gmail.com> <5F5E5CDB0670267DF04D9561@PST.JCK.COM> <01NG9VCEWETC0002QL@mauve.mrochek.com> <A6741735F236784CBB00AAD60DCED23F034FE5CB@XCH02DFW.rim.net> <20091120151251.B04DCF2403F@odin.smetech.net> <87iqd1v9qq.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org> <4B0A8B41.30005@gmail.com> <20091123124442.46510698@gg1.cs.columbia.edu> <4B11A797.5080905@gmail.com> <871vjgujwz.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org> <NCyhfVChvkuIY0f6uFcJRg.md5@lochnagar.gulbrandsen.priv.no> <871vjfoq9r.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: Nortel Networks
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:58:21 -0500
Message-Id: <1259614701.3782.389.camel@scott>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.5 (2.24.5-2.fc10)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Nov 2009 20:58:22.0235 (UTC) FILETIME=[DA0CC6B0:01CA71FF]
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:58:48 -0000

On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 18:50 +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no> writes:
> 
> > Simon Josefsson writes:
> >> There is no requirement in the IETF process for organizations to
> >> disclose patents as far as I can see. The current approach of only
> >> having people participate, and disclose patents, in the IETF is easy
> >> to work around by having two persons in an organization doing
> >> different things: one works on specifying and standardizing
> >> technology, and the other is working on patenting the technology.
> >
> > How can you practically avoid the first person knowing about it?
> 
> Make sure (through confidentiality agreements) that the second one do
> not talk with the first?  Putting them in different continents helps.

Not relevant in this case - the participating individuals were named on
the patent applications as inventors.  It would be hard to convince a
judge that they didn't know...