IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF Hackathon at IETF 92, March 21-22, Dallas, TX

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Wed, 25 February 2015 19:49 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E04CF1A802E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 11:49:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZX3J6q8rJBCa for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 11:49:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com [64.89.234.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E4531A1BCC for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 11:49:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A811DA01F3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 19:49:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-03.win.nominum.com [64.89.235.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4500353E0AB; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 11:49:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.20.107] (71.233.43.215) by CAS-03.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 11:49:04 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: IETF Hackathon at IETF 92, March 21-22, Dallas, TX
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <54103A5A-0A32-4AAC-ACBE-7B507D799CD3@lucidvision.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 14:48:55 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <1616529B-038E-49DB-AE4D-13B167262424@nominum.com>
References: <20150224170152.6224.60832.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <09B0A2B7-7D6B-4365-B58C-AAD97C3BE73D@lucidvision.com> <B32A64D5-0B07-4E01-92B1-DEAF21002EE7@netapp.com> <D1132FAF.3E752%eckelcu@cisco.com> <54EDF486.20000@gmail.com> <D275D180-272B-43C7-BDF0-FE2B438DEB60@lucidvision.com> <4723EB73-47F2-4408-ADAA-EF78A6A14FDA@nominum.com> <54103A5A-0A32-4AAC-ACBE-7B507D799CD3@lucidvision.com>
To: "Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-Originating-IP: [71.233.43.215]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/K4OSyz3oruhZ5zb2EEV0Afloeqw>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 19:49:06 -0000

On Feb 25, 2015, at 2:46 PM, Thomas D. Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com> wrote:
> Its a bit offensive to be courted with signup for Cisco's dev net program
> after clicking on an apparently IETF-sponsored link. The point I was making earlier is that its inappropriate based 
> on the IETF's past approach to these things. No one has given a good reason why either.

I think offensive is the wrong word.   It is a mistake, because most IETFers won't do it.   The right way to express this is to say "I don't think IETFers are going to do this, and I'm certainly not.   Can you set up an IETF mailing list and wiki for this?  Thanks!"

If the answer to that request is "hell no, we want the Cisco branding and won't do the hackathon without people registering for our developer thingy," then I'd definitely be right there with you in objecting, but can't we take it one step at a time?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email