Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC related mass bounces / disabled subscriptions (fwd) Jo-Philipp Wich: [LEDE-DEV] DMARC related mass bounces / disabled subscriptions

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Thu, 15 December 2016 20:14 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26C45129AC9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 12:14:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TY9wC1GUeGm7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 12:14:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DB8112711D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 12:14:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3tfl5Q0P8Cz3Hl for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 21:14:02 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1481832842; bh=QkgYNYmUCiUgDuzIDelaZF7bOqmnhr5O0U76b1xAne8=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=BCC6Wl3oW8jzWtjVfpYauScER+7cFHRXOGJjQJuxhB18phMpz0NpDKTBkuxjizOU5 MaWuYv7yLPYr2vT41KIyHgsxinxIfxOYkWRQmSGTIqaRIhtWnsINTXExPWmB1kVorT 5f69N+0oq7C3Df3G2d+PxajXoKBv0zN0knd8AY9w=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A6znQU6zvilZ for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 21:14:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (206-248-139-105.dsl.teksavvy.com [206.248.139.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 21:14:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EC1A66F5349; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:13:58 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 bofh.nohats.ca EC1A66F5349
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D659741888D2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:13:58 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:13:58 -0500 (EST)
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC related mass bounces / disabled subscriptions (fwd) Jo-Philipp Wich: [LEDE-DEV] DMARC related mass bounces / disabled subscriptions
In-Reply-To: <24005.1481827604@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.20.1612151513060.15183@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <25431.1481725548@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <5EF6F271-1CF7-4981-8E83-C7A7B49DB8F2@gmail.com> <CDE8A76C-ECD7-4370-9823-3C78144A8850@nohats.ca> <24005.1481827604@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (LRH 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/K8kVX8Nvh0Zf5mb-viOGF2tJNI0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 20:14:06 -0000

On Thu, 15 Dec 2016, Michael Richardson wrote:

>    > On my mail reader that will show me a list of abbreviated senders who
>    > are all "IETF discussion list on behal"
>
>    > This is already the case for me on the unbound mailing list and makes
>    > it basically unreadable for me.
>
> Yes, that's why nobody likes the DMARC "work around" that munges the From:
> address.
>
> But, the alternative is that some email that someone autocompletes
> to Paul Wouters, auto-learnt from a post to "unbound" or some other list,
> goes to the list rather than you.

False dichotomy.

Paul