Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations-08.txt>(Initial Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) AuthenticationScheme Registrations) to Informational RFC

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Sun, 27 October 2013 12:11 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D332F11E8131 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 05:11:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.943
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.943 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.344, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j7BWNqwpnniX for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 05:11:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2A1C11E8112 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 05:11:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.117] ([93.217.96.252]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MbOrg-1VHmNU0EGi-00Ijja for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 13:11:42 +0100
Message-ID: <526D02F8.9090000@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 13:11:36 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "t.p." <daedulus@btconnect.com>, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations-08.txt>(Initial Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) AuthenticationScheme Registrations) to Informational RFC
References: <20131021132502.29409.87117.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <012601ced160$93102ee0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
In-Reply-To: <012601ced160$93102ee0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:c4pVaXtUoBOZIx/kBysqyvv8qIqTk+YPeupGlh2Gd/KKgRUkFYC WQ40aTwL5sYE2Q8M6g3mS8HzA7byO6uGyFMOPWEydtzYIYjNY2sGOnhMlznr7EhZRqrM4RX oMvqzz8MXVjOjt5PYywGBUKVNvMVdcabqRRy9Lskt9UdNd4qez22zX8vh433knzxRCcgPSj F4ky1MYfpNlWvs58us8PQ==
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 12:11:49 -0000

On 2013-10-25 10:54, t.p. wrote:
> I see that we have been granted a fortnight to review eight,
> inter-related, httpbis I-Ds, comprising over 300 pages, ending in the
> ...

Of which only 250 are non-boilerplate, non-toc, non-changelogs...

Best regards, Julian