IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Acoustic couplers

worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) Sat, 05 January 2013 00:42 UTC

Return-Path: <worley@shell01.TheWorld.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58B7D21F876E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 16:42:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.98
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.98 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KTk--L4LpeoJ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 16:42:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from TheWorld.com (pcls5.std.com [192.74.137.145]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A7FE21F8765 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 16:42:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shell.TheWorld.com (svani@shell01.theworld.com [192.74.137.71]) by TheWorld.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r050fp8t000416 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 19:41:53 -0500
Received: from shell01.TheWorld.com (localhost.theworld.com [127.0.0.1]) by shell.TheWorld.com (8.13.6/8.12.8) with ESMTP id r050fpRM4514916 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 19:41:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from worley@localhost) by shell01.TheWorld.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id r050fpGh4501838; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 19:41:51 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 19:41:51 -0500
Message-Id: <201301050041.r050fpGh4501838@shell01.TheWorld.com>
From: worley@ariadne.com
Sender: worley@ariadne.com
To: ietf@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <A2EB5895-E8D7-4CD2-921A-22082631D0B5@shinkuro.com> (steve@shinkuro.com)
Subject: Re: Acoustic couplers
References: <20130102175839.2DDAE18C0BB@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <01OOIM6DH1HW00008S@mauve.mrochek.com> <50E4AFAF.4000506@dcrocker.net> <01OOIXYRHRN000008S@mauve.mrochek.com> <50E59B43.8000702@dcrocker.net> <2877F05C-BF25-42DE-BF77-1854CC955A54@shinkuro.com> <600960B19F7C535FA242D982@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <A2EB5895-E8D7-4CD2-921A-22082631D0B5@shinkuro.com>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 00:42:03 -0000

> From: Steve Crocker <steve@shinkuro.com>
> 
> I honestly don't remember whether the plugs were the clunky four pin
> or the then-modern RJ11.  I recall studying RJ11 and RJ45 plugs and
> sockets at some point and discovering that some plugs and sockets
> had six wires instead of only four or two.  I never did learn if
> they had a different number.  The form factor was the same.

Wikipedia has a long list:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Registered_jack It's probably not
complete.

Dale

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email