Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails

Robert Moskowitz <rgm-ietf@htt-consult.com> Tue, 08 December 2009 14:05 UTC

Return-Path: <rgm-ietf@htt-consult.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 919273A67A7 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 06:05:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PM60CSAKiUVo for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 06:05:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from klovia.htt-consult.com (klovia.htt-consult.com [208.83.67.149]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 751C33A6405 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 06:05:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by klovia.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65CE368B62; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 14:02:34 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at localhost
Received: from klovia.htt-consult.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (klovia.htt-consult.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ntAoudMAyjkJ; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 09:02:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: from nc2400.htt-consult.com (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4b8:3:1:21b:77ff:fe43:978]) (Authenticated sender: rgm-ietf@htt-consult.com) by klovia.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 87A3568235; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 09:02:24 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <4B1E5D24.1070309@htt-consult.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 09:05:24 -0500
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm-ietf@htt-consult.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090625)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: IETF Member Dave Aronson <ietf2dave@davearonson.com>
Subject: Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
References: <4B1E5330.4060805@htt-consult.com> <3f4922c70912080540v3054a2d3s324e70f4f1b90ac5@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <3f4922c70912080540v3054a2d3s324e70f4f1b90ac5@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 14:05:07 -0000

IETF Member Dave Aronson wrote:
> Robert Moskowitz <rgm-ietf@htt-consult.com> wrote:
>
>   
>> ALL my IETF mailing lists come to email accounts that I control on my own
>> mail server. but....
>>
>> I recently submitted my first Internet Draft since my company was bought by
>> a BIG TELCO, and it has BIG email filtering rules.  In large part these
>> rules were developed by my colleagues in the other part of my company that
>> was bought by the BIG TELCO.
>>
>> But the short of it is that only a small selection of email attachments are
>> let through and otherwise the email is dropped silently.  Thus the email for
>> validating an ID submission never got to my corporate email account.
>>     
>
> Maybe you could point out to The Powers That Be, that if they want any
> glory for their company for your work in helping shape the future of
> Teh Intarwebs, their silly mail rules are interfering.  Don't expect
> them to change their rules, just point out that you have a perfectly
> valid reason not to use a company email addy, for this sort of work.
>
> Meanwhile, use one of your personal addresses.  That's probably more
> permanent anyway; even if you don't leave the company, as you've seen,
> companies get bought.  The new owner doesn't always maintain the email
> processing for the old name(s).  Getting your own domain (or multiple)
> is generally your best bet.
>
> -Dave (owner of davearonson.com for mainly that reason, and a few others)

I have had htt-consult.com since '95.  I have wanted htt.com, but it was 
already taken by some guy in Spain.

Old email addresses has always been a problem here.  My email in RFC 
1918 has not worked for almost 12 years.

I also have an IANA enterprise number:  6715 that I actually used a 
couple times for some X.509 attribute work...