Re: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity)

"Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com> Tue, 07 August 2012 19:00 UTC

Return-Path: <jason_livingood@cable.comcast.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E8D21F8720; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 12:00:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.671
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.671 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.560, BAYES_00=-2.599, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1tue8sJQxvVy; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 12:00:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cable.comcast.com (copdcavout01.cable.comcast.com [76.96.32.253]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28CD611E80FC; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 12:00:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([24.40.56.115]) by copdcavout01.cable.comcast.com with ESMTP id C7WM3M1.28395548; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 12:40:53 -0600
Received: from PACDCEXMB01.cable.comcast.com ([169.254.1.168]) by PACDCEXHUB02.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::492e:3fa1:c2ad:e04e%13]) with mapi id 14.02.0309.002; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 15:00:25 -0400
From: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com>
To: "anshumanpratap@gmail.com" <anshumanpratap@gmail.com>, "Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)" <nurit.sprecher@nsn.com>, "ietf-bounces@ietf.org" <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>, ext Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity)
Thread-Topic: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity)
Thread-Index: AQHNdDlsH4mPHmQ940SebPH4CPOMHZdOsEEAgAAIEwCAAATjgIAAKCUA///QAYA=
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 19:00:25 +0000
Message-ID: <31BCE4DE825B3F4D9E452EFBBD3F1EF2834A0516@PACDCEXMB01.cable.comcast.com>
In-Reply-To: <1945895955-1344361933-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-52336685-@b18.c3.bise7.blackberry>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.2.120421
x-originating-ip: [24.40.56.165]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <CB2F980E21F55E448FF811993901AAA5@cable.comcast.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 19:00:58 -0000

BTW, if anyone finds the venue question extremely compelling / interesting
-- consider seeking a spot on the IAOC during the next nominating period.

- Jason