Re: Last Call: <draft-hoffman-tao-as-web-page-02.txt> (Publishing the "Tao of the IETF" as a Web Page) to Informational RFC

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Fri, 15 June 2012 21:27 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9390811E80D0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:27:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lMnIsWybMxLE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:27:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F7D611E8088 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:27:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.101] (50-1-50-97.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.50.97] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5FLR9G3031018 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:27:10 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-hoffman-tao-as-web-page-02.txt> (Publishing the "Tao of the IETF" as a Web Page) to Informational RFC
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <4FDBA317.4010001@stpeter.im>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:27:08 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E550DD2D-D21E-44D0-A987-0DE391ABD7DB@vpnc.org>
References: <20120615202915.11032.53296.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4FDBA317.4010001@stpeter.im>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 21:27:12 -0000

On Jun 15, 2012, at 2:03 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:

> One possible oversight is that this I-D does not describe how the editor
> will work on the tao-possible-revision.html file (e.g., will only the
> editor have permissions to work on that, might there be multiple
> committers, will it be under source control?). Are such details
> intentionally out of scope?


I would imagine that that would be determined by the IESG when they pick a Tao editor.

--Paul Hoffman