RE: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC
Terry Zink <tzink@exchange.microsoft.com> Thu, 03 November 2016 17:30 UTC
Return-Path: <tzink@exchange.microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F423B129A9E; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 10:30:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.003
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.003 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=exchange.microsoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B7gOIMHlX7cI; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 10:30:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM02-CY1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-cys01nam02on0103.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.37.103]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55DF6129A9F; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 10:30:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=exchange.microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=5LPFJDFC1ceStWfQFER1iA9fNy00q/2CQC0WZHKqOVY=; b=OYofWohr6FU8RXnbZ5hjwgNRYWmlfNFtnM9qz2jSEJ1+Gh0x99QyrZF+UFxWe7InaJVemrooJHpTrQoRb58p+JWtKaRd3Et7bn6XqQKUEqQ+EWWTjwu+auZUtegQHuVQD6TLZTYRd4vrQX405K6Mmb+I07j1rzmseTMu2mgRU7Q=
Received: from CO2PR00MB0101.namprd00.prod.outlook.com (10.166.215.142) by CO2PR00MB0104.namprd00.prod.outlook.com (10.166.215.136) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.732.0; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 17:30:20 +0000
Received: from CO2PR00MB0101.namprd00.prod.outlook.com ([10.166.215.142]) by CO2PR00MB0101.namprd00.prod.outlook.com ([10.166.215.142]) with mapi id 15.01.0732.000; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 17:30:20 +0000
From: Terry Zink <tzink@exchange.microsoft.com>
To: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC
Thread-Topic: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC
Thread-Index: AQHSNSJH3BjQyfeJdkSCE1IATqnOyqDGDISAgAAxtoCAABffgIAAExVwgADep4CAADzIsA==
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 17:30:20 +0000
Message-ID: <CO2PR00MB0101960D3E311D2E1D4E1C4296A30@CO2PR00MB0101.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>
References: <678C2FBA-A661-4556-A300-5C08562B5F8A@iii.ca> <29429.1478113235@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <CABa8R6vHdt75NFKW3s6xOzLcq=jmVAHDPX0tjLRdGpYSTP2cYA@mail.gmail.com> <20161102232357.b55vx7est7vjrdfo@thunk.org> <CO2PR00MB01018CDB45F0CE17671AD67596A30@CO2PR00MB0101.namprd00.prod.outlook.com> <20161103134909.lnndzi6feaqfskyj@thunk.org>
In-Reply-To: <20161103134909.lnndzi6feaqfskyj@thunk.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=tzink@exchange.microsoft.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:4898:80e8:6::566]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 02b8876b-2f1c-49d0-344e-08d4040f1600
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; CO2PR00MB0104; 7:y8m6xLJfjmYjhMfZczOQ+OTG7Vi0ZeJ1+sKDaOBMU1iA/QSuTMgy55/bwLBmhtaiNpZOiQk4mmaLYTH9LtN2jLgP57MkAMTbuCdgkeB9kn1x1aDYSlMYY4jmmXqQD3D8KjU45/J/vcz5g+7+q05aS2bf/mYUroRqiiq/KcZjAMlDrSaSO7PN8q3cEAdptIV7QNlL6LF6+19X8nLDHt3I1BM5BzgxE61h1yHJ8jXCJENnRa+3UhUwA3GUpDQMMBMfXzngKBh1o03GKoDX8SJ62GEVEozJ753gCOQP9gMAMIMfrtrmAoqCUAyXiRQoPUFwIJSFRtT89AkWr+5fE2pL0UjV/WkroPT31zzR7o4KKmWs4XfS2+emghpBNdLXAn+L
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CO2PR00MB0104;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CO2PR00MB01049A183C2CA69323C85C2E96A30@CO2PR00MB0104.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(189930954265078);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(61425038)(6040176)(6060213)(6045074)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(61426038)(61427038)(100007014)(6046074)(6061210)(6072074)(6047074); SRVR:CO2PR00MB0104; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:CO2PR00MB0104;
x-forefront-prvs: 011579F31F
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(7916002)(199003)(189002)(2501003)(33656002)(305945005)(86362001)(74316002)(7736002)(7846002)(189998001)(5001770100001)(54356999)(76176999)(97736004)(107886002)(102836003)(3660700001)(68736007)(101416001)(8990500004)(6116002)(8676002)(81166006)(81156014)(50986999)(76576001)(10290500002)(10400500002)(5005710100001)(106116001)(11100500001)(9686002)(450100001)(3280700002)(2900100001)(105586002)(99286002)(122556002)(77096005)(8936002)(92566002)(586003)(19580395003)(7696004)(2906002)(5660300001)(42882006)(87936001)(93886004)(106356001)(2950100002)(10090500001)(5002640100001)(197153002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CO2PR00MB0104; H:CO2PR00MB0101.namprd00.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: exchange.microsoft.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: exchange.microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 03 Nov 2016 17:30:20.4573 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CO2PR00MB0104
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/KGfz4EjiIVtn5X0oxTwE_c6RDoU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 17:30:29 -0000
>> Perhaps people can go to Outlook.com? What happens if they go to DMARC >> p=reject? Everyone can go an sign up for yet another domain? >> >> That just kicks the can down the road, but eventually that can will >> take no more kicks. > And then developers can move to fastmail.fm; there are quite a few mail providers, after all. > And I would expect market forces, combined with mail providers who aren't trying to send > official bills to consumers that can be easily phished from the same domain as their customers, > such that there will probably be at least one mail provider that will meet the need of developers > and other people who need traditional mailing lists as they have been implemented for decades. The average Internet user doesn't understand DMARC. The average person on an Internet mailing list doesn't understand DMARC either, and even the average tech person on a mailing list doesn't understand DMARC. All they know is that their mailing list doesn't work, or that they have been unsubscribed. Only people who work on DMARC understand DMARC. Asking the average person to switch their email address just so that they can participate in mailing lists isn't a solution. --Terry
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Dave Crocker
- IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Cullen Jennings
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC John Levine
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Ted Lemon
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC John Levine
- RE: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- RE: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC John R Levine
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Ted Lemon
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC John Levine
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Dave Crocker
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Ted Lemon
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Paul Hoffman
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC John C Klensin
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Ted Lemon
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Michael Richardson
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Yoav Nir
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Ted Lemon
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Yoav Nir
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Brandon Long
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Cullen Jennings
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Cullen Jennings
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC S Moonesamy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC John Levine
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC John Levine
- Identification of an email author (was - Re: [dma… Dave Crocker
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Ted Lemon
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Theodore Ts'o
- RE: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Terry Zink
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Theodore Ts'o
- Next step on IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Alexey Melnikov
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Bob Hinden
- RE: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Ted Lemon
- RE: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Terry Zink
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Steve Atkins
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Theodore Ts'o
- Options for temporary operational solution to DMA… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Brandon Long
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email autho… Brandon Long
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Franck Martin
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Hector Santos
- Re: Options for temporary operational solution to… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC John C Klensin
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Ted Lemon
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Michael Richardson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Michael Richardson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Michael Richardson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC John C Klensin
- Re: Options for temporary operational solution to… John Leslie
- RE: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email autho… Terry Zink
- Re: Options for temporary operational solution to… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email autho… Ted Lemon
- Re: Options for temporary operational solution to… John Levine
- RE: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email autho… Terry Zink
- Re: Options for temporary operational solution to… Ted Lemon
- RE: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Christian Huitema
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Options for temporary operational solution to… Michael Richardson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Michael Richardson
- Re: Options for temporary operational solution to… Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email autho… Franck Martin
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email autho… Khaled Omar
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email autho… S Moonesamy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Brandon Long
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email autho… Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email autho… Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email autho… ned+ietf
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email autho… Franck Martin
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email autho… Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email autho… John C Klensin
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email autho… Brandon Long