IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Hotel situation

Lloyd Wood <lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk> Sat, 09 January 2016 20:25 UTC

Return-Path: <lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 928D51A8AC8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 12:25:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P8tI7fd42BBW for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 12:25:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nm15-vm8.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com (nm15-vm8.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com [212.82.96.205]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 853431A8ABE for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 12:25:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s2048; t=1452371116; bh=ONzjsalKfuhx8uIwfH5l3J13NWGK33i1ma89Khv83cI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=Z7biFQxMW50KDHl39m6QU4Sta9OcHDjPdd+gmYEyp0LG3IAPnXb6VS+k9TfNXSH4as0KneGWOQO8XhO/nmC4AVwLgkFPiVELhYkwpA9bPYQqrv9WyBCXDKul8NDYIAY0R7G1AKs9Da3u1+fLk93xR74vAwycn39m1/WVyimO4QUgiimcu1OYCEnvk8DAv9QMBVxWVUcQnLD21fqCNnxFYpHyGGNwMi2usJRedlssMqPoaIciIdVZhB68D5JIZd0x+u736eD9WMeA/QeVXPWcHMCkyht8A/SlJOWeBSUFqayUDSpIraf3Tyi9dOjlZ4NE7weL/7pXfgDGo+DliwWPjw==
Received: from [212.82.98.127] by nm15.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Jan 2016 20:25:16 -0000
Received: from [212.82.98.82] by tm20.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Jan 2016 20:25:15 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1019.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Jan 2016 20:25:15 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 909083.89747.bm@omp1019.mail.ir2.yahoo.com
X-YMail-OSG: MxSlo.4VM1kaJoJc9k1XVLvJXdzRvj6ffaRVE_SoZbS0Cm00JUooRPDxUCS2w.i 15HXPWOlwYjKf2gX5dueJZMyufGr_.Gs0KwhMiDjzOP7N4GfY4Ts0vojeI82EbNfCpwTa7.Sjj51 ebJY3yhphfNaPBIX0EBWsFxStHL7Y2BQ6JAul7sghRgkuUoQO9gDH1fe_C_78.fyM43jNM4BBmP6 teqv3T2QkmUD.EM6gOi6dZPL.LtqJZBNX6lYmjse416RpM_NFPrqbWh3W.LDIBa0V4rbSYUvQhcx ECHf91wtC_wYgJNIRrWMOSqZknt0KrcvRndKj0BwdiWw9hQ6MrypObluITH8dsgL8PE3puoiMEkt R9NP7_xyLSZ42GpYgqYTBab1W6zGjvYIDuk0ES1e9aVmx87XJRQp0LS9tlOYVhXDBoH6jwaaTwDb m44QRuRI3DlPkmTpw4b5XVNrjHl9BajCu66q6VERb1k8XG_5YdZ0ovzlp9.4VQDrSMbjcnjTp_cP tmJ9565jjex1Wt7TDr_UZIH4zzdK1pynJ
Received: by 212.82.98.120; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 20:25:15 +0000
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2016 20:25:13 +0000
From: Lloyd Wood <lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk>
To: Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org>, Ole Jacobsen <olejacobsen@me.com>, IETF Discussion List <ietf@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <599402171.3997115.1452371113558.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <p06240605d2b600eb4317@[99.111.97.136]>
References: <p06240605d2b600eb4317@[99.111.97.136]>
Subject: Re: Hotel situation
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3997114_143226326.1452371113555"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/KQUEJxgsYgv_NKfbo0xb7fPkBa8>
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2016 20:25:19 -0000

 blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; border-left:1px #715FFA solid !important;  padding-left:1ex !important; background-color:white !important; }  and then there was that time physicists met in Las Vegas and the town told them never to return.

http://physicsbuzz.physicscentral.com/2015/09/one-winning-move.html


L.

the only winning move is not to bet on -00.


On Saturday, January 9, 2016, 11:14 AM, Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org> wrote:

At 8:19 AM -0800 1/5/16, Ole Jacobsen wrote:

>  Las Vegas would clearly win, but I have a strong impression that
>  many of our attendees would object to going there. (It also happens
>  to be a "tourist destination" for reasons that kind of escapes
>  me, but that's yet another discussion).

I'd be very upset if we started meeting in perhaps the last remaining 
all-smoking-all-the-time location in the U.S. or Canada.

-- 
Randall Gellens
Opinions are personal;    facts are suspect;    I speak for myself only
-------------- Randomly selected tag: ---------------
In Germany they came first for the Communists, and I didn't speak up
because I wasn't a Communist.  Then they came for the Jews, and I
didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew.  They came for the trade
unionists, I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist.  Then
they came for Catholics, and I didn't speak up because I was a
Protestant.  Then they came for me, and by that time no one was left
to speak up.                                        --Martin Niemoell

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email