Re: [Gendispatch] Academia (Re: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF)
John Wroclawski <jtw@isi.edu> Mon, 01 March 2021 03:37 UTC
Return-Path: <jtw@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C61733A13DD; Sun, 28 Feb 2021 19:37:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isi.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fzTL-Tt-uKuo; Sun, 28 Feb 2021 19:37:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from NAM04-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn8nam08on2040.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.100.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB1913A13DA; Sun, 28 Feb 2021 19:37:33 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=VnpCS2U/PxU0IJflP+WEA4Fmcq+qTUJgmUlnO40/Ey+9KnVY08aCSesfvd4ipoRecRdX252/3Y0wnOj8C70dh7+yvjEYF6kAI3Ja8DXVHyn5e0vumap9jm0yhgf4YldEZkplmQZptpFqyoVlE6J6+XjK+3NP5bopcUY0OLGDK2wobhbLAuQNn9dk/+uq5/Nw1+cL/gVHLN59uxXde9BCz2wRB50fHwTv+k+18vmb3wPxc3qkcYnOO2Vwlfyk0I/ihNcUmg27LnoahwRXN4Lhg8voyYzOpUMAvKyAsF73Y6L+jPPsdboLH6lW6HT1AHcW11C2oB2BUu7/IPQQIERnWQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=kAPOc6GwY2D0dEX/ewWmuT8Axfdfjw3Nrw7HmJKoDV8=; b=XthC144mLp20YQ8zMIUqior0/Nsle5OBRsvxmnBVC67G8qUejhF3n8xnOgUKHjsd9E2JJcmfb2MdRWvXEuz5v5eBDipiig/caF1eJbKgy31QB2+syp1l3Ts89X4AgrrGppKTBYAh/utwkiYDPLzNcmmMUFzRvX2Y/3rPQm57h5iT+EJYD0o8Wox32Odphs5SYiOpTinJbXJeF83SE1GmNXzotUYh56YlJAaJwMtzz/b43GauP8wSW3QSfh6r1tEg8PbG2kih9rscew2c40uDXQ8L06L8AiL794z0Iqi9BJ1YEzbKkuzLxUUejO7K2ATBJM6VcSMjczHVdmZU0YzaqA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=isi.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=isi.edu; dkim=pass header.d=isi.edu; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=isi.edu; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=kAPOc6GwY2D0dEX/ewWmuT8Axfdfjw3Nrw7HmJKoDV8=; b=d32o75gHL9FSTJ/fktkfTqipwC+f1Fr/qfunRQC4Kb2ZUJ6+W6eEl4zzmBc6ORZmQVU52G5JQDmD97f+w3RVtJVh5a+f38PS+a6QZ2R7md661ID2eehu3kBpUn+o5Dc2D/Mu0ftPwzG+SbuA8QzfYuRfmt6O0E3T1Xi5hjcXm/8=
Authentication-Results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=isi.edu;
Received: from DM6PR16MB3163.namprd16.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:194::12) by DM6PR16MB3483.namprd16.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:1c6::15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3890.20; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 03:37:29 +0000
Received: from DM6PR16MB3163.namprd16.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4417:679e:b207:e2e6]) by DM6PR16MB3163.namprd16.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4417:679e:b207:e2e6%5]) with mapi id 15.20.3846.049; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 03:37:28 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] Academia (Re: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF)
From: John Wroclawski <jtw@isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <5a2743c6-dbbf-6f31-a0cd-9a6098b56fbb@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2021 22:37:25 -0500
Cc: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>, Theresa Enghardt <ietf@tenghardt.net>, GENDISPATCH List <gendispatch@ietf.org>, Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B90AE293-F7B6-439B-8642-B3773C0F0647@isi.edu>
References: <37eecb9b-f0eb-e21c-b162-b1f0339e4981@si6networks.com> <41698b83-25ff-574e-390a-65a8c3dc591a@tenghardt.net> <eba4c0ba-830c-acc2-1e6d-cab480c61ee3@si6networks.com> <e0bd1f0a-92a3-abe0-1382-dab2f312d4cd@tenghardt.net> <0e35a879-b814-ca37-5d8a-1f8e18c2d4a2@si6networks.com> <b1a58fd2-d26a-4480-9b81-67875a635ecd@tenghardt.net> <201DFFC0-89D9-4653-A500-8DDC6ACDE667@eggert.org> <5a2743c6-dbbf-6f31-a0cd-9a6098b56fbb@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.17)
X-Originating-IP: [65.96.111.179]
X-ClientProxiedBy: BL0PR02CA0098.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:51::39) To DM6PR16MB3163.namprd16.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:194::12)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1
Received: from jmp.cambridge.schlepp.org (65.96.111.179) by BL0PR02CA0098.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:51::39) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3890.20 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 03:37:27 +0000
X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 2acd7086-eb34-4804-e485-08d8dc6355fe
X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: DM6PR16MB3483:
X-MS-Exchange-MinimumUrlDomainAge: acm.org#10608
X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: <DM6PR16MB3483C52B5392B7ECA5F2EBE9BA9A9@DM6PR16MB3483.namprd16.prod.outlook.com>
X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:10000;
X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:DM6PR16MB3163.namprd16.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(366004)(136003)(396003)(39840400004)(376002)(346002)(786003)(316002)(6916009)(26005)(36756003)(66556008)(16526019)(956004)(83380400001)(186003)(5660300002)(75432002)(66476007)(478600001)(66946007)(54906003)(6486002)(2616005)(966005)(2906002)(4326008)(53546011)(8676002)(6512007)(6506007)(8936002)(33656002)(86362001)(52116002)(45980500001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: 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
X-OriginatorOrg: isi.edu
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 2acd7086-eb34-4804-e485-08d8dc6355fe
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DM6PR16MB3163.namprd16.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Mar 2021 03:37:28.9208 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 336f97ac-2a54-469a-a939-2050bb2fc0a6
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-MailboxType: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-UserPrincipalName: hGka2Z1/U/OKtJwM/pJC3wY3q2c4TlnBuMg1LOeS3QaRNfVfPrsV1JGvSdZBsRT4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM6PR16MB3483
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/KR5al98VC231ph0sD0az_bhBp40>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2021 03:37:36 -0000
> On Feb 25, 2021, at 4:21 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Good point about publications. RFCs are publications, too, so there is definitely some ROI in (co-)authoring an RFC as an academic. However, usually the entire process takes much longer than writing academic papers. And I'm not sure how academia at large values RFCs relative to papers, but at least in the part that I know, I would say they're valued. >> >> One thing we did to increase the value of RFCs to academics was to assign them DOIs, which at least for universities in some geos is a prerequisite to even recognizing RFCs as academic output. > > Nevertheless, it is in general hard to get RFCs recognised as valuable for tenure and promotion purposes, compared to more traditional publication streams such as highly-rated journals. That's one reason we did https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1672308.1672315 but I'm not sure it has had much impact. Seconding Brian’s comment (and Keith’s in the next msg), the DOI effort and CCR articles were excellent, necessary first steps, but by themselves they’re not likely to change the landscape very much, I think. The issue is more fundamental. Academia wishes to claim that its highest value publications are “original research”, and consensus-driven standards with the stated goal of codifying existing or emerging practice don’t “look” like that. My weasel words are because both sides of this stereotype are sometimes truly true and sometimes, well, not. But it's the perception, and it’ll be really hard to get the academic publication world to weigh RFCs heavily without changing it in some way. Which, I think, might possibly be doable. Academia does have other values - you can get brownie points for a good survey paper, for example, because you’re "systematizing knowledge" - and increasingly (although not as much as one might hope) work that validates research results by showing the they’re repeatable is seen as publishable. But the trick here is to frame this as a case that RFCs and IETF participation advance some substantive academic value - not just to argue that they follow the “form” of academic publication by being peer-reviewed and having DOIs. I’m not sure if anyone’s every quite tried to do this, but it seems at least potentially possible. —john
- Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF Fernando Gont
- Re: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF Bron Gondwana
- Re: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF Keith Moore
- Re: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF Dominique Lazanski
- Re: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF Fernando Gont
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Fernando Gont
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Dominique Lazanski
- Re: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF Carsten Bormann
- RE: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF Hannes Tschofenig
- RE: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF Hannes Tschofenig
- RE: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF Bron Gondwana
- Re: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
- Re: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF Bron Gondwana
- RE: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Stephen Farrell
- Re: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF Keith Moore
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Dan Harkins
- RE: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF Roman Danyliw
- Re: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF Donald Eastlake
- Re: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF Fernando Gont
- Re: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF Carsten Bormann
- Making headway in the IETF [was Diversity and Inc… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Making headway in the IETF [was Diversity and… Keith Moore
- Re: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF Mark Nottingham
- Re: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF Keith Moore
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Diversity and Inclusiveness in the… Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Diversity and Inclusiveness in the… Bron Gondwana
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Mary Barnes
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Bill Woodcock
- Re: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF Tim Bray
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Diversity and Inclusiveness in the… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Diversity and Inclusiveness in the… Bron Gondwana
- Re: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF Keith Moore
- Re: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF Jim Fenton
- Re: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Building Real Internet Platforms Mark Nottingham
- RE: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF Larry Masinter
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Diversity and Inclusiveness in the… Jim Manico
- Re: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF Carsten Bormann
- We appear to still be litigating OAuth, oops Bron Gondwana
- Re: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF S Moonesamy
- Re: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF Keith Moore
- RE: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Hannes Tschofenig
- RE: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF Hannes Tschofenig
- RE: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF Hannes Tschofenig
- RE: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Vittorio Bertola
- coders in IETF (was: Diversity and Inclusiveness … Keith Moore
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Carsten Bormann
- RE: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Bron Gondwana
- Re: coders in IETF (was: Diversity and Inclusiven… Bron Gondwana
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Bron Gondwana
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Neil Madden
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Aaron Parecki
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Jim Willeke
- Re: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Justin Richer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Aaron Parecki
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Mary Barnes
- Re: coders in IETF (was: Diversity and Inclusiven… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Tim Bray
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Christian Huitema
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Warren Parad
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Warren Parad
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Warren Parad
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Michael Richardson
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Phillip Hunt
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF Michael Thomas
- RE: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Vittorio Bertola
- Re: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF Keith Moore
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Keith Moore
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Fernando Gont
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Michael Thomas
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Fernando Gont
- Re: coders in IETF (was: Diversity and Inclusiven… Christian Hopps
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Fernando Gont
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Bron Gondwana
- Re: coders in IETF (was: Diversity and Inclusiven… Christian Huitema
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Jen Linkova
- Academia (Re: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the … Theresa Enghardt
- Re: [Gendispatch] Academia (Re: Diversity and Inc… Fernando Gont
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Dan Harkins
- Re: [Gendispatch] Academia (Re: Diversity and Inc… Theresa Enghardt
- Re: [Gendispatch] Academia (Re: Diversity and Inc… Christian Huitema
- Re: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF S Moonesamy
- Re: [Gendispatch] Academia (Re: Diversity and Inc… Fernando Gont
- Re: [Gendispatch] Academia (Re: Diversity and Inc… Fernando Gont
- RE: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Hannes Tschofenig
- RE: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF Hannes Tschofenig
- RE: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF S Moonesamy
- Re: [Gendispatch] Academia (Re: Diversity and Inc… Theresa Enghardt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Warren Parad
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Seán Kelleher
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Seán Kelleher
- Re: [Gendispatch] Academia (Re: Diversity and Inc… Lars Eggert
- RE: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Andrew Campling
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Fernando Gont
- Re: [Gendispatch] Academia (Re: Diversity and Inc… Fernando Gont
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Salz, Rich
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Fernando Gont
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Salz, Rich
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Fernando Gont
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Salz, Rich
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Marc Petit-Huguenin
- document writing/editing tools used by IETF Keith Moore
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Fernando Gont
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Salz, Rich
- Re: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Keith Moore
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Fernando Gont
- Re: [Gendispatch] Academia (Re: Diversity and Inc… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Gendispatch] Academia (Re: Diversity and Inc… Keith Moore
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Fernando Gont
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Salz, Rich
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Salz, Rich
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Fernando Gont
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Salz, Rich
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Keith Moore
- Re: document writing/editing tools used by IETF Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: document writing/editing tools used by IETF Carsten Bormann
- Re: document writing/editing tools used by IETF Joel M. Halpern
- RE: document writing/editing tools used by IETF Larry Masinter
- Re: document writing/editing tools used by IETF Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: document writing/editing tools used by IETF Keith Moore
- Re: document writing/editing tools used by IETF Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Fernando Gont
- Re: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF S Moonesamy
- RE: document writing/editing tools used by IETF Larry Masinter
- Re: document writing/editing tools used by IETF Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Gendispatch] Academia (Re: Diversity and Inc… Lars Eggert
- Re: document writing/editing tools used by IETF Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [Gendispatch] Academia (Re: Diversity and Inc… Lars Eggert
- Re: document writing/editing tools used by IETF Julian Reschke
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Lars Eggert
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Lars Eggert
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Fernando Gont
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Lars Eggert
- Re: [Gendispatch] Academia (Re: Diversity and Inc… Colin Perkins
- Re: document writing/editing tools used by IETF Andrew McConachie
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Vittorio Bertola
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Bill Woodcock
- Re: document writing/editing tools used by IETF Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: document writing/editing tools used by IETF Carsten Bormann
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Justin Richer
- Re: document writing/editing tools used by IETF Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: document writing/editing tools used by IETF Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Tim Bray
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Aaron Parecki
- How to tell people... Was: We appear to still be … Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: document writing/editing tools used by IETF Keith Moore
- Re: How to tell people... Was: We appear to still… Keith Moore
- Re: document writing/editing tools used by IETF Julian Reschke
- Re: document writing/editing tools used by IETF Carsten Bormann
- RE: document writing/editing tools used by IETF STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Christian Huitema
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Michael Thomas
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… David Waite
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Aaron Parecki
- Re: coders in IETF (was: Diversity and Inclusiven… Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: document writing/editing tools used by IETF Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: document writing/editing tools used by IETF John Levine
- Re: document writing/editing tools used by IETF Carsten Bormann
- Re: document writing/editing tools used by IETF Michael Richardson
- Re: document writing/editing tools used by IETF Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: document writing/editing tools used by IETF Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: document writing/editing tools used by IETF Carsten Bormann
- Re: document writing/editing tools used by IETF Keith Moore
- Re: document writing/editing tools used by IETF Carsten Bormann
- Re: document writing/editing tools used by IETF Brian E Carpenter
- Re: How to tell people... Was: We appear to still… Michael Richardson
- Re: How to tell people... Was: We appear to still… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: document writing/editing tools used by IETF John Levine
- Re: document writing/editing tools used by IETF Keith Moore
- Re: document writing/editing tools used by IETF Michael Richardson
- Re: document writing/editing tools used by IETF Christian Huitema
- Re: document writing/editing tools used by IETF Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Gendispatch] Academia (Re: Diversity and Inc… John Wroclawski
- Re: document writing/editing tools used by IETF John Levine
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Bron Gondwana
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in … Bron Gondwana
- HTML for email (was: Re: document writing/editing… Keith Moore
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Vittorio Bertola
- Re: HTML for email (was: Re: document writing/edi… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Warren Parad
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating O… Jeff Craig
- Re: document writing/editing tools used by IETF Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: HTML for email tom petch
- RE: HTML for email Larry Masinter
- Re: document writing/editing tools used by IETF Salz, Rich
- RE: document writing/editing tools used by IETF STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: HTML for email Keith Moore
- Re: HTML for email Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: HTML for email (was: Re: document writing/edi… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: HTML for email Nico Williams
- Re: HTML for email Nico Williams
- Re: HTML for email Nico Williams
- Re: HTML for email Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: HTML for email Keith Moore
- Re: HTML for email Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: HTML for email Bron Gondwana
- Re: HTML for email John Levine
- RE: HTML for email Larry Masinter
- Re: HTML for email Brian E Carpenter
- Re: HTML for email Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: HTML for email tom petch
- Re: HTML for email tom petch
- Re: HTML for email ned+ietf
- Re: HTML for email Nick Hilliard
- Re: HTML for email Keith Moore
- Re: HTML for email ned+ietf
- Re: HTML for email tom petch
- Re: HTML for email Nick Hilliard
- Re: HTML for email Nico Williams
- Re: HTML for email tom petch
- Re: HTML for email Nico Williams
- Re: HTML for email Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: HTML for email Keith Moore
- RE: HTML for email Larry Masinter
- Re: HTML for email Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: HTML for email Keith Moore
- Re: HTML for email Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: HTML for email Keith Moore
- Re: [Gendispatch] Academia (Re: Diversity and Inc… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Gendispatch] Academia (Re: Diversity and Inc… Wes Hardaker