Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities

Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net> Mon, 03 April 2017 17:32 UTC

Return-Path: <huitema@huitema.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19F33129469 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Apr 2017 10:32:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.397
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.397 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.796, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JGf60ih-AoVo for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Apr 2017 10:32:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx43-out1.antispamcloud.com (mx43-out1.antispamcloud.com [138.201.61.189]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D9081294A2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Apr 2017 10:32:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xsmtp05.mail2web.com ([168.144.250.245]) by mx43.antispamcloud.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from <huitema@huitema.net>) id 1cv5q1-0004od-9Z for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 03 Apr 2017 19:32:26 +0200
Received: from [10.5.2.31] (helo=xmail09.myhosting.com) by xsmtp05.mail2web.com with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <huitema@huitema.net>) id 1cv5pp-0000Av-00 for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 03 Apr 2017 13:32:18 -0400
Received: (qmail 22531 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2017 17:32:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.1.100]) (Authenticated-user:_huitema@huitema.net@[172.56.42.160]) (envelope-sender <huitema@huitema.net>) by xmail09.myhosting.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with ESMTPA for <ietf@ietf.org>; 3 Apr 2017 17:32:07 -0000
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <149096990336.4276.3480662759931758139.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <9fee9874-1306-07a2-a84a-4e09381a5336@cisco.com> <E67FDB14-9895-48E0-A334-167172D322DB@nohats.ca> <20170403152624.GA11714@gsp.org> <93404c29-78ba-ff9b-9170-f5f2a5389a31@gmail.com> <E068F01A-B720-4E7A-A60F-AA5BDA22D535@consulintel.es>
From: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
Message-ID: <ac736542-2394-feb0-3aaa-c75f15162f5f@huitema.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 10:32:04 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <E068F01A-B720-4E7A-A60F-AA5BDA22D535@consulintel.es>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities
X-Originating-IP: 168.144.250.245
X-SpamExperts-Domain: xsmtpout.mail2web.com
X-SpamExperts-Username: 168.144.250.0/24
Authentication-Results: antispamcloud.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=168.144.250.0/24@xsmtpout.mail2web.com
X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Class: unsure
X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.36)
X-Recommended-Action: accept
X-Filter-ID: s0sct1PQhAABKnZB5plbIVbU93hg6Kq00BjAzYBqWlVTHAar8Je/lORhy3PZJU8LERWeKKG4PAQY Nyavp7c49EdlGitVsfXsrKty9N3esIJTugiLDom8V25hond3K4RsO76XSTAwtV4mg4i2ouCDa4AU hvIWAV5xUW/+gAh4vXpv7AxO+5FNucWAwhBFOJK/RcOb18WfxGyg6Om6u4YYm9W+X6dknWcMJVco zZrQYuI5hjoyEb9Oq0NWpyO3vrfYy2h1mQR50Wwo5hSyeApVLD3dKxLhoxcmaInYbR5vlqGudzLe k2TYFBStSOMccbr5Uz0sPgnpAk2KA2vJwMd1uWhCmLzOxTAcQmFWVARhgNqBNFD3an3wiMp49rVr ybSB0ktSrwQbrgk6jfwMHIN4qnTFgIfDMShmlQFqCr5hA8xAXSGwpLGc/Znuh3MoIpK0d13OC0Fp +u8Ltg3XM4AI47bRF0J+AL6gRRwFcty0/RGJ+cv73CChOPjKA0/DVd83mzKXD5o/Ia+BqyQ7Q0nt IZ2PVtMHd8bHCmdzlxzVIEgwyGTHIAoNFX+jcW7DGmdE6eBVl9/A6GtGi+mfMSANmgQ9/T0zHbtC pLbhgZ6Z/Qhqxiuap5uKiBpffUsHYsfmrbtbs8GJuRKR6hnrta1usy6F/SOWlhnS7qkS/mOkSgD5 8bDUIriOSOQTK7vaz2jBsjp0rjSY76LAIHA6cW4Oa0X1c90QyXfvSiR99EaOACq0wyQPgYbWCRpe waGWkMJTxdwDV/LdQk4Dnvnv/o4ZpIN8Tfe43vaXKX/yihCEqxIlRZaHuAWSnHeK3PdSA6Q+2n/k rhIYlNMbfS0wdTtG+6KM/oHosNdKX7z8UU/FfpPcu6wTHpnlfUs9BUPj1rZ3
X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@quarantine5.antispamcloud.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Kf2ToQtJwmOy9CLLDHBuzJl3RFs>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2017 17:32:31 -0000


On 4/3/2017 9:39 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> I’m not convinced (despite laws may say it), if computer inspection, even “temporal” confiscation, is being used in EU. At least I never heard about that, and even less in my own country, though I may be missing cases in other EU countries.
You are indeed missing something.

Here is one pretty famous case, happened in Heathrow: Greenwald's
partner detained, thumb drives confiscated.
http://www.thedrum.com/news/2013/08/19/snowden-documents-seized-heathrow-intimidation-says-greenwald-his-partner-detained

Here is a clip about Canada's refusal to disclose laptop search policy:
http://boingboing.net/2010/02/09/canadian-customs-ref.html

Article 60 of French custom code authorizes inspection of anything you
carry, can be interpreted as authorizing search of laptops or cell phones:
https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichCode.do;jsessionid=AA678D3E2AC873493D4025F33776856A.tpdila20v_2?idSectionTA=LEGISCTA000006138841&cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006071570&dateTexte=20130315

Various European countries, including the UK and France, have passed
inquisitive snooping laws. Maybe they are less visible than what happens
in the US, but I would not hold my breath...

-- Christian Huitema







>
> Definitively if that happens to me in EU, I will not provide passwords even if I don’t have anything to hide, but just because customer’s info confidentiality, signed NDAs, etc. I don’t think that will bring me to the jail. However, in US, detention is a fact, right?
>
> Regards,
> Jordi
>  
>