Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists

Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> Sun, 13 April 2014 20:22 UTC

Return-Path: <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A0581A02CA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 13:22:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.018
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.018 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GDs_k6jw2hrH for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 13:22:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server1.neighborhoods.net (server1.neighborhoods.net [207.154.13.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A18671A02D3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 13:22:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by server1.neighborhoods.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78A2CCC09C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 16:22:30 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.6.2 (20081215) (Debian) at neighborhoods.net
Received: from server1.neighborhoods.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server1.neighborhoods.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id cbDxtXf1+9O4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 16:22:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from new-host.home (pool-173-76-155-14.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [173.76.155.14]) by server1.neighborhoods.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 37DFCCC09F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 16:22:24 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <534AF1FF.5090503@meetinghouse.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 16:22:23 -0400
From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:28.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/28.0 SeaMonkey/2.25
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
References: <53499A5E.9020805@meetinghouse.net> <5349A261.9040500@dcrocker.net> <5349AE35.2000908@meetinghouse.net> <5349BCDA.7080701@gmail.com> <01P6L9JZF5SC00004W@mauve.mrochek.com> <534AEDF4.6080801@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <534AEDF4.6080801@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/KkdfxiD2byFFC_JiRcUbQvP9dQY
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 20:22:33 -0000

Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Ned (and others),
>
> Thanks for the explanations. Very helpful to a non-expert.
>
> On 13/04/2014 11:35, Ned Freed wrote:
> ...
>> The real question we should be discussing is what options the IETF has to try
>> and address this.
> Yes please. I don't think it's going to work to dump this problem
> in the lap of the Independent RFC Series Editor.
>
>     Brian

Yes!

Miles

-- 
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.   .... Yogi Berra