IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-historic-01.txt> (Moving IP versions 5, 8, and 9 to Historic) to Historic

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Thu, 17 March 2016 21:40 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FC8B12D6B7; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 14:40:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dBcYCw6SV-9y; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 14:40:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x234.google.com (mail-io0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7619112D692; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 14:40:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x234.google.com with SMTP id o5so31757746iod.2; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 14:40:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references :to; bh=qOS16aPLsEH8IOWioFhB4cfauyyj4EcbgjeJeWZC0Bs=; b=d2aR3Kf9f81kzfn41aHg8iD/+u6PEOpdiySXBkM5y/M2KsD7XnS/xRH4RGcJKn5B1r gFbSendi8PSoMnzb/aqOM2NuEjvEb6F1xnYjsbLESfJ2YqCtKv76KSbLdl4xY/XaBi5d L2aSsTZRMw31Jw3mwTM8t6Dso04bSppECgC55qWVyFF20FjBLoG+xsmvCNp5wgAQSqsK ezvU+3sVaIqwTFvj6fDDat0BC69qPaXkDoT7QqnS1B6LmSXc/dWb6MrXZDQSf7qrS/E6 iUYNfbB9sdtc6srUwK4HETPl7hFyEDlX0JZw2iqbJzj0VPv0K4i5NdNJhNj8crFxe64A WAcg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=qOS16aPLsEH8IOWioFhB4cfauyyj4EcbgjeJeWZC0Bs=; b=Q5n2PEgwqCu8TlfoXH6i1QDFHys9WNl4Nx8sgC25aMxoFj+INllXnG/v2u9ktMpVGN vX2q69AT/wc/8awKy8H8vm1PQD8LyV0TAQPYgyK5kmAt17Pftyf++8yMrZJSToONU/Ep k/PDLtPliOxD5jE6787VVlw+11W3NJzySa9xCEc7sQODXaLxPzgRmXdKzBqxl8a5Rp34 E9HveY+oi3lqcTK59YPnj/GvVJtjl0w2QgDgd6bUy5GMkL1Y3Pp492uD3K+LK0AMGxkb fS/FaWTbXLguxiPkneODgrf23qZwKGiBXUDWhkTDMar9ll1Mlop2Sx7Bw4/PGIY3Df1p nOCg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJDBFaGM3+neBjHl/JqEIxnW+3SGhocT0cqNvqsJEoxT9s2TPGdX3o7FGmQFg79iw==
X-Received: by 10.107.170.6 with SMTP id t6mr14428675ioe.71.1458250842710; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 14:40:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.224.219] ([209.97.127.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x125sm4440961iod.23.2016.03.17.14.40.40 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 17 Mar 2016 14:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Last Call: <status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-historic-01.txt> (Moving IP versions 5, 8, and 9 to Historic) to Historic
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B42C1F15-7062-487C-971E-21AAB49871A0"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.2
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <56EB0FE9.5020602@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 14:40:37 -0700
Message-Id: <ACF5B604-8543-45B5-A967-DD4A03CA5AD7@gmail.com>
References: <20160317191526.8948.67217.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <56EB0FE9.5020602@gmail.com>
To: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/KqHElVGDb1Hp_QfjCzK05nwPfQc>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, pip-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-st2-spec@ietf.org, st2-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-pip-architecture@ietf.org, rfc1347@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 21:40:47 -0000

I support this status change.

> On Mar 17, 2016, at 1:13 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> If we are doing this, then I think that CATNIP (RFC1707) needs to be made
> Historic at the same time, even though it didn't need an IP version number.

I agree.

> 
> I also recall rumours that some people were actually using ST2 at one point.
> Are we sure that it's totally gone away?

I think ST2 is historic, so changing it’s status is fine even if it seeing some actual use.

Thanks,
Bob



> 
> Regards
>   Brian Carpenter
> 
> On 18/03/2016 08:15, The IESG wrote:
>> 
>> The IESG has received a request from the Internet Engineering Steering
>> Group IETF (iesg) to consider the following document:
>> - 'Moving IP versions 5, 8, and 9 to Historic'
>>  <status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-historic-01.txt> as Historic
>> 
>> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
>> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
>> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2016-04-14. Exceptionally, comments may be
>> sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
>> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>> 
>> The file can be obtained via
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-historic/
>> 
>> IESG discussion can be tracked via
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-historic/ballot/
>> 
>> 
>> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>

v2.34.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status