privacy in ipv6 ?
Gigablast <gigablast@mail.com> Mon, 15 August 2016 22:44 UTC
Return-Path: <gigablast@mail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EAB512D795 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 15:44:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rQiUo5zy-N9X for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 15:44:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.com (mout.gmx.com [74.208.4.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EC0D12D5B2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 15:44:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.5] ([75.160.49.8]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmxus002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M8lOE-1bTy2o3VJk-00CBXt for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 00:44:26 +0200
Subject: privacy in ipv6 ?
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <RT-Ticket-133239@www.ietf.org/rt> <5787D61E.8080000@mail.com> <rt-4.0.8-10907-1470931216-1570.133239-6-0@www.ietf.org/rt>
From: Gigablast <gigablast@mail.com>
Message-ID: <57B245C9.2070309@mail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 16:44:25 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <rt-4.0.8-10907-1470931216-1570.133239-6-0@www.ietf.org/rt>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:lh/Lw8gcvHq1AsAa5ERC0tdPIimY2jyyGjJEwMmGxs5pznhxV8V u2L/1C/jol2DrqTfVINSogWhzWUECt+29aY4D02m1yF11Obe03BfO2m1R+MPBqp11dcB8rO +DcT96ROem1U/oTBfFORHg+utmgzmVCogbfKm0eGSnIS75GAy3LHdb0+IJUAUhHztpwTmQs YdC0ynbMR4Ssoa1xdus1A==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:+Aa3HKZ18f8=:PIzwas0R7ORDipsCxd9Uba zIiqb+EtU/f0F6znBOFG9zAnCbNdBxkrBuJ8H4Wun+VLj+5EiDb0GomiYSV5U1YbGcNr559b4 L6IXZVdKPnIVyVnzYYo85AucGwewLk5/3nYJgvHFid7Xxjr2DpOjvRs1LuDnHZA1NbhaDXeBG dlzQt44G0AJ+esEa6IrUa+1B0ig+yt0X9IBByGB0K8+4wvwblr+y2pzMiZBkuhn86XU6czzrR UKKXuoVVtJFe5Zj9w4d1V3NOssKeyYooxBGijnInP5Q3wPehVL7Qs+dYHQcVZF+3aggcrMgkP CSEzoofoO2nElmKdBu7qFF1nw6yRG5ymvl45fhgVjAWxjKW+rvKENApnLQYdCE8VwK0wXukqC VGJ/diUuh6Ra3jC2xJYtyM7T0Td9DJz/EYV1qjplzb+oXsGDq6hc/xXNZSNmXhYYDL93qByaM iucV0zj/u9IwBlA9StkxNtNR52TitnNtRumQhMDC72StjDDNci4rWiP4VTPqFQfqhIzXQ5ABd p04attFfTGK9g9AxZ1RaoSnXi7T4cIoF8ekcNHIpQtcusd43eSyX6syEkQhKgzBTK+z6qSZM1 h7sk3C3zORJ4ynlssSa7sEYCv1j4U2mWy0sqpjya/gy0uIUKJiN3xHVujlDfI+K2cNP94fvDH D7/d9Id6jq32JDicsCVu26GbyEbTrtv6w4keS09sBfA9OV9q7/Sh1fy2q3IbzWQfTDCzwGO+E LNIzjIdOS6BzD5hUnq1s4FX59jy+ApN7sotVkK441kU6KTEW20KB36hgt7K4A6ZFDkCOQaJpD 7ulyVeA
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Kz-HkUvOv4t8jr5-vrwGTx_EKwo>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 08:23:05 -0700
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 22:44:30 -0000
hi, would it be possible to insert some kind of 'privacy' flag into each data packet in IPv6 so that the originating IP address would be scrambled at each router hop? (kinda like how NAT works, but on internet backbone routers) websites and other services that would be afraid of 'attacks' could opt out and just drop such packets. just wondering if something like this is already in production or if it would be something interesting, because a lot of people are more and more concerned with privacy and do not want to be traced by their IP address. furthermore, this might help bolster net neutrality. i run a small search engine and can't compete with google/bing because a small handfull of providers (cloudflare, etc.) are blocking my legitimate crawler from millions of the top websites. matt
- Re: privacy in ipv6 ? joel jaeggli
- privacy in ipv6 ? Gigablast