Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 27 March 2008 21:31 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57F6F28C8CC; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:31:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.614
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.614 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.177, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sVh7oPrxsx3m; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:31:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 249DA28C3C0; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:31:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F18D28C2DC for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:31:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v+ZUFe5-WoYE for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:31:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.186]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 360273A6CC0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:31:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c10so2100590nfd.39 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WJalIKrVuwDsd9dmlZ7e9aqdOrulLLTt2qPrERMy/RU=; b=MV8QujAd4jyxXBy7NwnF0msQAuSTsA6ZAfgJ5x0z3D5BbRK+UEbsdohawJzzdKLktBhKo/kUGAs6l+m3a6RrQzUE3DDyjHYd8w+2iy83R3b1qoYFtkITj6Df3MkU42q2zAmpdigs6RrnkSdy/ksZnLCWimGJkVb7Xtyp7XrN2WY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=IKbBkGPKcEr4AxxoNp+gqHNR4YXLJVHBgWBuyptOTj/WWgmb/F7TD85hIYVk0kwd+7SHYPhiwKVF3KLUUlUh4jNRf+LUxK1SKt058BZUIt4yhJrWnxM7qLL9ef6Olcnkhf7JIIoRkMtQZ3nYYHGIT2B8kwe7ev+H0lruJEsmEqo=
Received: by 10.78.145.16 with SMTP id s16mr5008035hud.23.1206653332519; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:28:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?130.216.38.124? ( [130.216.38.124]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y1sm531680hua.22.2008.03.27.14.28.48 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:28:51 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <47EC118D.4090002@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:28:45 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Leslie Daigle <leslie@thinkingcat.com>
Subject: Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments
References: <20080324200545.D6E6328C3AE@core3.amsl.com> <59EDC2DC-7692-4716-8753-50A1826198A3@NLnetLabs.nl> <F649B47CE8FECD00817DAC38@beethoven.local>
In-Reply-To: <F649B47CE8FECD00817DAC38@beethoven.local>
Cc: Olaf Kolkman <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
While not really disagreeing with Leslie and Olaf, I would point out that the IPR WG was chartered to look at IETF documents. We can have a meta-discussion about where the clarifications belong, but it seems to me that the WG consensus definitely assumed that scope and no wider scope. I'd be happy if that was made clear in the drafts, rather than trying to cover the other documents streams by some kind of awkward retro-fit. Brian On 2008-03-28 08:15, Leslie Daigle wrote: > > --On March 27, 2008 10:33:24 AM +0100 Olaf Kolkman <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl> > wrote: >> I would think that the document would gain in clarity if it explicitly >> ties the incoming rights to the streams as defined in RFC4844 and also >> explicitly calls out that if new streams would be defined those should >> specifically define if and how rights are transferred to the IETF Trust. > > I would have to agree with the above, and say further that the > the IAB should make sure that the entities responsible for > the non-IETF streams are okay with the result. > > When writing the streams definitions, it was clear that there was a > lot of material that was spread across existing documents without > clear delineation between "IETF" or "non-IETF" documents, let > alone further refinement into what has become "streams". THat's > understandable, historically, but we should be clearer going > forward. Breaking it out, as you suggest, would be consistent > with that goal. > > Leslie. > >> >> While reviewing the documents I tried to determine how the 4 streams >> currently defined in RFC4844 fit into the framework. >> >> Although the stream is not specifically mentioned it is clear that the >> incoming rights document applies to the IETF Stream. >> >> To me it is clear that a contribution to the IAB is explicitly bound by >> the rules (including the No Duty to Publish rule, that allows for >> confidential information to be supplied to the IAB), so are contributions >> from the IAB, i.e. IAB stream document. I conclude this from the fact >> that "IAB" is part of the IETF under the definition in 1.e. However, I >> may be over-interpreting, and the status of the incoming rights for the >> IAB stream is also not captured. >> >> The independent stream document are clearly excluded by section 4 of the >> document. >> >> It is not quite clear where the IRTF stream document live. This could be >> fixed in a document which defines the IRTF stream. >> >> I would think that the document would gain in clarity if it explicitly >> ties the incoming rights to the streams as defined in RFC4844 and also >> explicitly calls out that if new streams would be defined those should >> specifically define if and how rights are transfered to the IETF Trust. >> >> >> >> --Olaf (no hats) >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > IETF mailing list > IETF@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Russ Housley
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Joel M. Halpern
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Sam Hartman
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Olaf Kolkman
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Leslie Daigle
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Olaf Kolkman
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Simon Josefsson
- RE: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Lawrence Rosen
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Scott O. Bradner
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Joel M. Halpern
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Simon Josefsson
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Ted Hardie
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Ray Pelletier
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments SM
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Margaret Wasserman
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Peter Saint-Andre
- RE: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Peter Saint-Andre
- RE: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Lawrence Rosen
- RE: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments michael.dillon
- -outbound copying rights grant Joel M. Halpern
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Simon Josefsson
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Simon Josefsson
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Simon Josefsson
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Spencer Dawkins
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Paul Hoffman
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Simon Josefsson
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Simon Josefsson
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Paul Hoffman
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Simon Josefsson
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Frank Ellermann
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Joel M. Halpern
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Ted Hardie
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Randy Presuhn
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments David Morris
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Simon Josefsson
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Simon Josefsson
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Simon Josefsson
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Ted Hardie
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Olaf Kolkman
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Ray Pelletier
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments Simon Josefsson