Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Fri, 14 February 2020 01:15 UTC
Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83E07120020 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 17:15:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NEEH9cTaQmJR for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 17:15:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (bsa2.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4800112001A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 17:15:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [198.252.137.10] (helo=PSB) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1j2Pa9-000OoS-Jh; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 20:15:49 -0500
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 20:15:43 -0500
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Job Snijders <job@instituut.net>
cc: ietf@ietf.org, surfer@mauigateway.com
Subject: Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
Message-ID: <481668CE67A920D22FB45F67@PSB>
In-Reply-To: <CACWOCC_pozvWBmhBDVn0Be3u3v-nU6=j=Rq_xQJNh6g+mpZqVg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20200213130739.3F8A3D1A@m0117460.ppops.net> <200449A9145F39429CA47D2C@PSB> <CACWOCC_pozvWBmhBDVn0Be3u3v-nU6=j=Rq_xQJNh6g+mpZqVg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.10
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/L8QVmS2kewE4DMmd7HTgmehdA4I>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 01:15:55 -0000
--On Thursday, February 13, 2020 16:34 -0600 Job Snijders <job@instituut.net> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 16:16 John C Klensin <john@jck.com> > wrote: > >> (ii) that we not >> pretend that refunding the registration fees of those whose >> visas are denied covers the potential costs to participants >> who make arrangements to attend and then are forced to >> cancel... > > If you need a visa, generally it is not recommended to book > travel or make arrangements before getting that visa approved. > Assuming a "visa on arrival" always has risks associated. Of course. But that is not what I was saying. At the cost of more words, let me explain. There are really two groups of cases: Group 1 - the visa situation: If I need a visa, apply for one, pay the early registration fee, and then the visa is denied (or just does not come through), the IETF will refund the registration fee (this, as Jay's note pointed out, has been IETF policy for a long time). My booking travel or making other non-refundable arrangements before the visa arrives would be inadvisable, as you suggest, except that, as Ole points out, that may be impossible in practice. In addition, making no arrangements before the visa is approved would be almost certain to force one past the (now-expired) early registration deadline, so the IETF's refund policy is a good one. However, if one delays making, e.g., air reservations until the visa is approved and the visa doesn't arrive until just before the last possible time to travel to the meeting, the only available airfares could quite possibly be premium ones -- enough more expensive relative to fares available before the visa application was completed to exceed the cost of the registration fee. So there is something of a gamble there and the refundable registration fee doesn't really solve the potential problem. And my comment about refunding the registration fees if visas are denied not eliminating the financial risk still apply. Those scenarios have almost nothing to do with the Corona Virus situation except insofar as some countries react by denying visas to much larger numbers of people, perhaps by origin country. Group 2 - the virus situation: Now consider someone who successfully obtains a visa (or does not need one), makes air and hotel reservations, and arrives at the airport intending to fly to the meeting. Then, because of policy shifts, they are either denied boarding or arrive in the destination country and are denied admission and sent home or, worse, locked up somewhere for 14 days. Every country that I know of reserves the right to do such things, visa or no visa, if they believe or claim there is a significant public health concern or some other issue. The air fare is probably lost (airlines may refund it as a good will measure but are not required to do so, especially if the flight was already taken). At least part of the hotel booking fees are lost because the cancellation deadline was before the intended departure time. Does the IETF refund the registration fee? Current policy is, I think, ambiguous, but the point was that, relative to those other costs, the registration fee may be a drop in that particular bucket. And _that_ was the point I was trying to make. If things get complicated with visa delays, visas being canceled after being issued, people being denied entry despite having visas, people being forced to make potentially non-refundable airplane reservations in order to obtain visas, or late meeting cancellations, let's not pretend that offering to refund the registration fee under some circumstances eliminates the financial damage. And I am _not_ predicting any of those things will happen. I am just pointing out that they are all within the realm of possibility for some IETF participants and that, especially if we continue to insist that people participate as individuals (whether that is true for individual cases or not), there can be significant financial and other costs and the IETF probably has some responsibility for its actions other than "we will refund the registration fee if you apply for a visa and don't get it". best, john
- IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Andrew Alston
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Carsten Bormann
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Carsten Bormann
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Christer Holmberg
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Kathleen Moriarty
- RE: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Belotti, Sergio (Nokia - IT/Vimercate)
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Vittorio Bertola
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Robert Raszuk
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Mary B
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Kyle Rose
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Jordi Palet Martinez
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? John C Klensin
- RE: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Belotti, Sergio (Nokia - IT/Vimercate)
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Michael StJohns
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Stewart Bryant
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Carsten Bormann
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Richard Barnes
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Scott Weeks
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Victor Kuarsingh
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Carsten Bormann
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? John C Klensin
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Job Snijders
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Scott Weeks
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Ole Jacobsen
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? John C Klensin
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Jay Daley
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? John C Klensin
- RE: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Vittorio Bertola
- RE: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Roberta Maglione (robmgl)
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Alexandre Petrescu
- RE: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Ron Bonica
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Bob Hinden
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Michael StJohns
- RE: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Andrew Alston
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - scaling infra Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - scaling infra Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - scaling infra Andrew Alston
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - scaling infra Robert Raszuk
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - scaling infra Jared Mauch
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - scaling infra John C Klensin
- IETF WG meetings and remote participation Robert Raszuk
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation Carsten Bormann
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation Keith Moore
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation Robert Raszuk
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation Joel M. Halpern
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation Robert Raszuk
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation Melinda Shore
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation Victor Kuarsingh
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation Keith Moore
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation Robert Raszuk
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation Carsten Bormann
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation Salz, Rich
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation Yoav Nir
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation Christer Holmberg
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation Christer Holmberg
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation Christer Holmberg
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation Carsten Bormann
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation Christer Holmberg
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation John C Klensin
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Ole Jacobsen
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Jay Daley
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Ole Jacobsen
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Jay Daley
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? John C Klensin
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Jay Daley
- Another strategic discussion (Re: IETF 107 and Co… Eliot Lear
- RE: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Roni Even (A)
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Livingood, Jason
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Andrew G. Malis