Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome to the "Ietf-honest" mailing list])
TSG <tglassey@earthlink.net> Tue, 10 February 2009 19:27 UTC
Return-Path: <tglassey@earthlink.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A0863A69E2 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:27:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.506
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.506 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.093, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9dQGmwvCvzpt for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:27:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.68]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC8083A6AEA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:27:13 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=XCjYUa8PGO2k/QYwJ5xNNRt7xPXALSmgDWcovivEadt3b/xDUJU6g4tqla3keiz8; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Received: from [64.125.79.23] (helo=[192.168.0.32]) by elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <tglassey@earthlink.net>) id 1LWyGK-0003R8-Gf; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:27:16 -0500
Message-ID: <4991D517.7060601@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:27:19 -0800
From: TSG <tglassey@earthlink.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome to the "Ietf-honest" mailing list])
References: <4990CC68.2000200@dcrocker.net> <20090210012022.GK920@cisco.com> <5073352A-C49F-4603-962A-B4DC5A9E9C90@cisco.com> <20090210171217.GA6465@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090210171217.GA6465@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ELNK-Trace: 01b7a7e171bdf5911aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec79229e8c173ac3095efee28a05664c67cb350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 64.125.79.23
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:27:14 -0000
Scott Brim wrote: > Excerpts from Cullen Jennings on Tue, Feb 10, 2009 09:40:55AM -0700: > >> On Feb 9, 2009, at 6:20 PM, Scott Brim wrote: >> >> >>> Dean's mail does not hurt any of us. OK, it does take a minute of >>> our time to unsubscribe but that's it. >>> >> In my opinion it is not alright for someone to harvest email address >> off and IETF list then subscribe all those people to some list they >> did not consent to be on? >> > > I see your point, but does it warrant a perpetual irrevocable ban on > all interactions? > So then you would also ban those company's who use this same tactic. Cisco and many others do use this as a part of spraying their advertisement's all over so unless you want to the GC dispute this as true, then we need to move on > >> PS. I would also like to point out that though Dean may allow Scott >> to unsubscribe, there are many people that he does not allow to >> unsubscribe. >> > > Are you sure of that? Have you tried? > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > >
- It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome to th… Dave CROCKER
- Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome t… Randy Presuhn
- Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome t… Scott Kitterman
- Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome t… Scott Brim
- Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome t… Scott Brim
- Re: [Ietf-honest] It's time for some new steps (w… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome t… Cullen Jennings
- Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome t… Scott Brim
- Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome t… David W. Hankins
- Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome t… Dave CROCKER
- Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome t… Marshall Eubanks
- Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome t… TSG
- Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome t… Scott Brim
- Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome t… John Levine
- Re: It's time for some new steps Wes Hardaker
- Re: It's time for some new steps Randy Presuhn
- The Dean list (was: It's time for some new steps) Andrew Sullivan
- Re: The Dean list Harald Alvestrand
- Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome t… Rich Kulawiec
- Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome t… Clint Chaplin