Re: Current mailbombing is instigated by FSF

TSG <tglassey@earthlink.net> Fri, 27 February 2009 23:56 UTC

Return-Path: <tglassey@earthlink.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A1F33A6AF0 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:56:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.639
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.639 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.040, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hlu9z4eu13Hd for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:56:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.68]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 222E43A6AD1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:56:54 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=M1snyqOuJUH1Opiz6fj1i4c0cyIUYMJa9oKIW26z3SpvE5vaezD+MU8NN+i/s9yV; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Received: from [67.180.133.66] (helo=[192.168.1.101]) by elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <tglassey@earthlink.net>) id 1LdCZw-0000ia-Ss; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:57:16 -0500
Message-ID: <49A87DDB.2040302@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:57:15 -0800
From: TSG <tglassey@earthlink.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Subject: Re: Current mailbombing is instigated by FSF
References: <D45CC79B-0EDC-4111-BC8B-06F6BC14CA50@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <D45CC79B-0EDC-4111-BC8B-06F6BC14CA50@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ELNK-Trace: 01b7a7e171bdf5911aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec79ff326dbf3446a062d0877d22aebf7f00350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 67.180.133.66
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:56:55 -0000

Carsten Bormann wrote:
> http://www.fsf.org/news/reoppose-tls-authz-standard
>
> While I have a lot of sympathy for the cause, I have very little 
> sympathy for the methods.
I have NO sympathy for the cause.
> Rendering a mailing list that might be useful for actually resolving 
> the issue inoperative by a "campaign" is idiotic.
> Somebody from I* (the IETF chair may not be the right person this 
> time) should call them and explain that this is not the way to win 
> friends and impress people.
>
> Gruesse, Carsten
>
> PS: kill-filing messages CCed to campaigns@ietf.org might help a bit.  
> I don't know if the procedures allow to do this at the mailing list 
> level.
Boy do I agree with you - The creation of a standard *** should *** have 
nothing to do with IP rights or licensing. The creation of any standard 
should JUST be based on whether proper vetting happened and whether the 
minimum number of ports was created and formally tested for 
interoperability. Anyone - and I mean ANYONE should be able to get a 
Standard by making the steps happen.

Todd Glassey
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>