IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.txt> (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Procedures for the Management of the Service Name and Transport Protocol Port Number Registry) to BCP

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Wed, 09 February 2011 06:38 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB6CF3A6917; Tue, 8 Feb 2011 22:38:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nlN4hHyiCsXR; Tue, 8 Feb 2011 22:38:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com (mail-pz0-f44.google.com [209.85.210.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A76B53A6900; Tue, 8 Feb 2011 22:38:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by pzk5 with SMTP id 5so1631163pzk.31 for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 22:38:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:subject:mime-version:content-type:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to:x-mailer; bh=h94Jts137J/3ATEjb2Xg0inTmBUVZwQeIG1S3cFtB/Q=; b=KaSVk8bz2bNVBQRLup2zgw09DjTQj9ZVXu8LfdgMvMSIrUWIuyej7H1U/865/B2N6V 8XY7/AixDhoXQLQk3p7SnU7g8xHzwuZdll71Uyd8wlMj3B96l6euMuR9FPVWbFAgidIF 2gFtokSl/LzyA14aA6PDhcOZmUIoJZ4QVjVXg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=YqBG1fhzd1vifZjZ6IPP/r3UvkowGcBiYaCunxewKxd91YgBNl2pp7LmOv6tNbtp+G wUj6AMDpBoATrQYWjg8aCl4Dyn7VS7O/vXP0rUUTM+dem+oNxrkmbKMKPkuDb02tSqhA jlXePY9XLAMz02Qr1Vnam7GZWu10ACAnezBIg=
Received: by 10.142.173.8 with SMTP id v8mr17884190wfe.397.1297233526534; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 22:38:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.104.74.0] ([62.50.232.90]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w42sm1389753wfh.3.2011.02.08.22.38.39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 08 Feb 2011 22:38:44 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.txt> (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Procedures for the Management of the Service Name and Transport Protocol Port Number Registry) to BCP
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CEBCE3CF81D2D441B14B84256C3C46810BD95BD8@TK5EX14MBXW651.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 07:38:36 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F547C5C9-22D8-4794-9EA6-C54E1DCB390C@gmail.com>
References: <20110118212603.5733.34489.idtracker@localhost> <B88A8A82-9C4A-40AC-89AF-F177260760F7@cisco.com> <ECA80A72-4E72-44D2-B40E-C90D7197E8C5@nokia.com> <4D421795.70505@isi.edu> <tslbp2vh8ig.fsf@mit.edu> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1102071321290.4671@adax.adax> <CEBCE3CF81D2D441B14B84256C3C46810BD95BD8@TK5EX14MBXW651.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
To: Christian Huitema <huitema@microsoft.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Cc: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, Chris Benson <cbenson@adax.com>, IESG IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 06:38:41 -0000

On Feb 8, 2011, at 9:41 PM, Christian Huitema wrote:

>> I don't see that "public identity" (of expert reviewers) is required for "interactive discussion".  
>> Or would anonymous interaction fail a Turing test of some kind?
> 
> Public identity is required for reviewer accountability. It is easy to imagine how withholding registration of some required numbers may delay a competitor's products. The best protection against shade is sunlight.

+1

Bob


> 
> -- Christian Huitema
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email