Re: Revisiting DNS Notation

Mohsen BANAN <public@mohsen.banan.1.byname.net> Thu, 08 August 2002 18:04 UTC

Received: from loki.ietf.org (loki [10.27.2.29]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA21472; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 14:04:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from adm@localhost) by loki.ietf.org (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) id OAA08858 for ietf-outbound.10@loki.ietf.org; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 14:04:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [10.27.2.28]) by loki.ietf.org (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA08822 for <ietf-mainout@loki.ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 14:01:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) id OAA21339 for ietf-mainout@loki.ietf.org; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 14:00:11 -0400 (EDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: ietf.org: majordom set sender to owner-ietf@ietf.org using -f
Received: from submit8.mail.intra (12-230-105-33.client.attbi.com [12.230.105.33]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id OAA21332 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 14:00:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (qmail 7079 invoked by uid 1001); 8 Aug 2002 17:59:16 -0000
Message-ID: <20020808175916.7078.qmail@submit8.mail.intra>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: Internet Technical Community <ietf@ietf.org>, public@mohsen.banan.1.byname.net
Subject: Re: Revisiting DNS Notation
References: <20020806134223.1611.qmail@submit8.mail.intra> <075e01c23d85$d3316690$dd876540@amer.cisco.com> <20020808022050.6174.qmail@submit8.mail.intra> <200208081648.g78GmMgD007606@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
X-Envelope: envelope@mohsen.banan.1.byname.net
From: Mohsen BANAN <public@mohsen.banan.1.byname.net>
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2002 10:59:16 -0700
In-Reply-To: <200208081648.g78GmMgD007606@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Lines: 48
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-ietf@ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: ietf@ietf.org

Valdis,

Yes. It is possible to on a case by case basis
(say within dig) to do the reversal.

The key question is "Why is that reveral done in dig?"

Do you genuinely believe that DNS notation backwardsness
is all imaginary?

Please think about the real issue here.

The DNS notation is in fact backwards.
I am not making it up because I want to do
harm to .... There is a real problem here.

I live inside of emacs and use completion for everything.
Files, C/C++/Java/... identifiers, Data Base objects,
elisp commands, ... 

But we can't do completion on http://www.vt.edu inside of
emacs. Where you could on edu.vt.www. And the completion
ability becomes a lot more interesting as we have more diversity
on the top level. Or if the name spcae roof is raised.

Internet object naming rules (e.g., URLs) is inconsistent with the
rest of computing object naming rules.

The long term social value of fixing this fundamental problem is
huge. However, because people usually can't tell the importance of
what they are missing, recognising the significance of the problem is
tough.

Now, can you please tell me what is wrong with pointing this
out and hoping that cooperative measures can be taken towards 
fixing it? 

Admitting that we do have a problem is usually the first 
step towards progress.


Thanks.

...Mohsen.