IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: future of identifiers

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Sat, 02 November 2013 04:14 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34D6011E8197 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 21:14:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CLjVrE3rvE-P for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 21:13:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BCE011E8194 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 21:13:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1B1D2CC5F; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 06:13:42 +0200 (EET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rFjuel5y1KWL; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 06:13:41 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50B222CC48; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 06:13:41 +0200 (EET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
Subject: Re: future of identifiers
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553BA85458@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 21:13:40 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D8A7EFE1-D546-4946-A46C-1243C805B187@piuha.net>
References: <9F02AA5D-4146-4F8D-B635-DE5B44A9DA9A@piuha.net> <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553BA85458@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com>
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org Discussion" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 04:14:06 -0000

> it might be a good thing if we were to first identify what needs to be identified.
> ...
> But seriously, I'd suggest we start from first principles before thinking about solutions here. What needs to be identified, and what characteristics does it have?

Agreed, of course. This is a key part of the future I wanted to understand. (But not to forget possible evolution of current identifiers or their characteristics.)

Jari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email