IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: FWIW: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt to Proposed Standard

Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> Tue, 10 February 2009 05:32 UTC

Return-Path: <timbray@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3BED3A691C for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 21:32:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.746
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.746 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.230, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UgnG+5gZsaeE for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 21:32:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.179]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46BAC3A68F4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 21:32:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m33so1338972wag.5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 21:32:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:reply-to:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=7ECzyJz2A6udghxIHUNGJiWgSfqIEOmEu9I8k8/ICxs=; b=H7cr8wgl5vyUtFcQMUUFJGM7OKVavENwi/5UV7P2B1K+SUx+AtNjOBlz4w0XDPTQ/W 17ij0ni3ESkH+7+qS4S5a7X0AaQY8RMX3cyFw7u3AmLpd3pcydIL56kWhQH6BQPDlxr1 pSoJ92q5uJZ+WEp7f4Ok3mwuSOD0AeQGunf9Y=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=SOZHzKvOtzA4JnXpChdvAoHvAp60uNU1KwFsrARCDM04ZxaFWP7JCiypkUqOffjKKm oKywP8ZTg6KGMaWvMgvf9Hd4wgNUeH6WJODuC95lzQwanTwjEEIZGfPji5EbHD5nmbin s0t15ckFK4uvrlQNwr7Jrlex3bzkt9bPjtv1k=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: timbray@gmail.com
Received: by 10.114.194.1 with SMTP id r1mr4216248waf.149.1234243939356; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 21:32:19 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4990DD75.3090206@gmail.com>
References: <498F9419.80300@ieee.org> <4990DD75.3090206@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 21:32:19 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: eb982564b27cf3a0
Message-ID: <517bf110902092132r1233fbb4ud0bed9b56eab7872@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: FWIW: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt to Proposed Standard
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00163646c1da924f10046289cfdf"
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tbray@textuality.com
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 05:32:18 -0000

On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Brian E Carpenter <
brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:

> FWIW (and it would be good if other actual
> IETF participants care to indicate +1 if they agree):
>
> The actual words in RedPhone's current disclosure:
>
> "RedPhone Security hereby asserts that the techniques for
> sending and receiving authorizations defined in TLS Authorizations
> Extensions (version draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt) do not
> infringe upon RedPhone Security's intellectual property rights (IPR)..."


I'm wondering why you reproduced this paragraph and omitted the following
six.  This is not a rhetorical question. -Tim


>
>

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status