Re: Fwd: [Ianaplan] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA protocol parameters registries) to Informational RFC

[Andrew Sullivan <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 06:35:25AM -0500, Jari Arkko wrote:
> This is the second forwarded message.
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> > From: "Richard Hill" <[e-mail]>

> > Regarding the "sheperd writeup", I have requested some changes, see:
> > 
> > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/current/msg01415.html

I saw Richard's message making that request, but the shepherd's
write-up had already been sent and the chairs agreed with it.  In my
view in this case, it is correct for the write-up to be left as is and
for those who disagree with that report to raise their concerns during
IETF last call, as is being done.

For whatever it's worth, I do not agree with the requested additions
or amendments, either because I don't think they make meaningful
changes to the write-up for the purposes of evaluating the WG's
conclusions (the first and, to some extent, the second requests) or
else because they're too specific to one view that was "in the rough"
(the third and to some extent the second requests).

Best regards,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
[e-mail]