Re: On harassment at IETF

"Dr. Pala" <madwolf@openca.org> Sat, 30 March 2019 11:22 UTC

Return-Path: <madwolf@openca.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 424D212019B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Mar 2019 04:22:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.889
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.889 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_HK_NAME_DR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TK89GvCA0rtB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Mar 2019 04:22:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.katezarealty.com (mail.katezarealty.com [104.168.158.213]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D27AB120197 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 Mar 2019 04:22:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mail.katezarealty.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93E03374128E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 Mar 2019 11:22:10 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at katezarealty.com
Received: from mail.katezarealty.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.katezarealty.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 5YB6mKjRTPVk for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 Mar 2019 07:22:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from Maxs-MacBook-Pro.local (unknown [77.241.229.232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.katezarealty.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6D98337407F9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 Mar 2019 07:22:08 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: On harassment at IETF
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <91e75af7-03f9-7565-5a9f-26f5f7bc9f29@openca.org> <FCE33107-1AF5-47B7-9F46-3BDD281E4DEB@live555.com> <79b0861a-b309-876a-47c7-7961e8fbf961@openca.org>
From: "Dr. Pala" <madwolf@openca.org>
Message-ID: <3c47fdfd-4207-fac6-cfbe-68fdc7a0ac58@openca.org>
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2019 12:22:06 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <79b0861a-b309-876a-47c7-7961e8fbf961@openca.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------F45A62FE034313CB1883A8A3"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/LcDPg4rEtz4jhwJJbl5FZInsyqM>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2019 11:22:13 -0000

Hi all,

small (but important) distinction: let me re-write one of the sentences 
here (I do not want to be mistaken). When I wrote:

    " in my message, in any way, I wanted to imply that people that have
    experienced this issue, should come forward if they do not feel like
    doing it (for absolutely ANY reason) - It is extremely difficult
    (and requires a lot of courage) to speak out."

I mean that "/in my message I NEVER WANTED to imply that people... /" - 
I just wanted to clarify the point because while I was re-reading the 
e-mail I realized that what I wrote might not convey what I wanted to say.

Best,
Max


On 3/30/19 12:15 PM, Dr. Pala wrote:
>
> Hi Ross,
>
> I understand your point of view and - on the surface, at least - it 
> might appear like I am advocating for the same behavior that we are 
> trying to prevent. I actually think that if you dig a little deeper, 
> the two are very different. I am sorry about the fact that this may 
> have come across very strong and lacking compassion - that was not my 
> intention. I tend to be very strict when it comes to unjust behavior, 
> and the fact that I do really care about this topic does not justify 
> me being too harsh or suggest policies/solutions.
>
> One very important aspect I would like to further explain is that in 
> my message, in any way, I wanted to imply that people that have 
> experienced this issue, should come forward if they do not feel like 
> doing it (for absolutely ANY reason) - It is extremely difficult (and 
> requires a lot of courage) to speak out. The first priority, I think, 
> as a community, is to provide compassion and support to help the 
> individuals to handle the situation. And maybe there could be means to 
> allow who reports anything to be involved and have their saying about 
> how to handle the situation - it could be that no official action is 
> requested, but at least we might understand (in an anonymous form 
> even) how widespread this issue is.
>
> I do not have the answers - it is a very complex problem. However, as 
> a Community I think we need to continue to work on this and strive for 
> a safer and happier environment. We try and we might succeed or we 
> might fail... and if the latter happens, we just look at why we 
> failed, where we can improve, how we can provide a better support 
> network - until we finally eradicate this fowl behavior. And if we 
> fail again, we work together to improve again.
>
> After all, if this is still going on, maybe we shall think about new 
> ways to address this issue.
>
> In my opinion, there is also the possibility for an even harder 
> target. Although, I understand that we might not change the world in a 
> day, but we could provide a model that could be brought back home to 
> our companies and our communities around the world. We might not solve 
> this problem around the world, but if we do not even try... what does 
> it say about us ?
>
> I thank everybody who replied and I hope this discussion inspired deep 
> introspection in each and every one of us: awareness is not a 
> solution, but, I think, a good start. Many good points have been 
> raised, and I hope that the conversation will continue.
>
> I would be happy to further explore solutions with the ombusteam 
> (https://www.ietf.org/contact/ombudsteam/) - if there is an interest 
> to continue the conversation in a more appropriate venue (now that, I 
> think, we raised a bit the level of awareness in our great Community).
>
> Cheers,
> Max
>
>
> On 3/30/19 1:43 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>> On the subject of “harassment” - I hope I’m not the only person who sees some irony here:
>>
>>> And if you are one the people that think this community will tolerate your behavior maybe because you are a well-known figure in the Industry, be sure of one thing: I will fight to make sure that (a) your behavior is publicly exposed, and (b) you get shamed and BANNED from IETF. The behavior, I think, should also be reported to the HR department of the organization that sent that individual for further actions.
> -- 
> Best Regards,
> Massimiliano Pala, Ph.D.
> OpenCA Labs Director
> OpenCA Logo
-- 
Best Regards,
Massimiliano Pala, Ph.D.
OpenCA Labs Director
OpenCA Logo