IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: new directions in mlm traffic: integration

Jaap Akkerhuis <jaap@NLnetLabs.nl> Sun, 10 January 2021 09:55 UTC

Return-Path: <jaap@NLnetLabs.nl>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B34903A1024 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 01:55:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nlnetlabs.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zIhX7hsaAgst for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 01:55:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bela.nlnetlabs.nl (bela.nlnetlabs.nl [IPv6:2a04:b900::1:0:0:15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1037C3A1022 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 01:55:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bela.nlnetlabs.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bela.nlnetlabs.nl (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 10A9tlTG029141 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 10 Jan 2021 10:55:47 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jaap@NLnetLabs.nl)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nlnetlabs.nl; s=bela; t=1610272548; bh=dppSRYfIYRcgCpee+0FKuxjIwSyLcKkYp2ZVf9EE6gk=; h=To:cc:Subject:From:In-reply-to:References:Date; b=R6HTefkDeJN5r73k+07SYetIYf0AEACqgSxXPlKbEqg4TX8MfOb6tmuwEFMYq1Po1 pm/Gqj8whm/QQ9jhZM66N0m/17djXKNbF8vf7JJuuDKwj9efJNW0yoEOsMwon+rbUO 3ANY3FrlBCmIGfYDWiHjXIptD8LEAVecRwcWOr614KyGQmNH2L89nAHhTAz8RUyamX Db7XDxfH50v/jdkUEP/IFTUtO1gQdrVdJqr+BxNuRotXSaYYsWuvbc+cNwgWuA738H m9kjmZDUKA17WUNLH9G3rt8BtzOUijtB3UhvUKAr3hmPItIumcP9HJdXLj273/V3TC veISX4tLm2f4w==
Received: from bela.nlnetlabs.nl (jaap@localhost) by bela.nlnetlabs.nl (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) with ESMTP id 10A9tlkE029138; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 10:55:47 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jaap@NLnetLabs.nl)
Message-Id: <202101100955.10A9tlkE029138@bela.nlnetlabs.nl>
X-Authentication-Warning: bela.nlnetlabs.nl: jaap owned process doing -bs
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: new directions in mlm traffic: integration
From: Jaap Akkerhuis <jaap@NLnetLabs.nl>
In-reply-to: <20210110031922.92D4B68A9C94@ary.qy>
References: <20210110031922.92D4B68A9C94@ary.qy>
Comments: In-reply-to "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> message dated "09 Jan 2021 22:19:21 -0500."
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <29136.1610272547.1@bela.nlnetlabs.nl>
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 10:55:47 +0100
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/LhbCJLp7cYRa9bteipuzE3tH6E0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 09:55:54 -0000

 "John Levine" writes:

 > 
 > >Forum software has been around for decades at this point though and 
 > >doesn't have the limitations of being tied to MUA UI. ...
 >
 > >If there's any interest, I could write an I-D with it a little bit more 
 > >baked. Apologies if this has already been discussed.
 >
 > It sems ike a reasonable thing to look into but I'd think a more
 > productive way to go would be to see what software already exists that
 > does this kind of stuff, preferably with credible paid support. We
 > already have too much custom bespoke stuff for applications that
 > aren't really all that unusual.

The RIPE-NCC uses a platform whichs allow email and forum discussions.
I think it is home grown but am not sure,

	jaap

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email