Re: [79all] IETF Badge

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Fri, 12 November 2010 01:47 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A57F28C12D for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 17:47:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.500, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NvkNa8ATianL for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 17:47:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.bortzmeyer.org (aetius.bortzmeyer.org [217.70.190.232]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC47428C10B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 17:47:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id 869D195D99; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 02:47:56 +0100 (CET)
Received: by horcrux (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1A3A2157992; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 09:45:35 +0800 (CST)
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 09:45:35 +0800
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [79all] IETF Badge
Message-ID: <20101112014535.GA2775@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1011090344110.46514@fledge.watson.org> <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B2202288A0B@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com> <4CDBCD06.2020108@dcrocker.net> <4CDBFAE7.6030800@ripe.net> <4CDC0A4E.3040604@dcrocker.net> <4CDC141F.6070609@stpeter.im> <4CDC77AD.9000302@gmail.com> <4CDC7E27.90003@dcrocker.net> <AANLkTi=tc72O0BaUfmyoJ8aO8q87+hhqciCQ11tmZV+O@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=tc72O0BaUfmyoJ8aO8q87+hhqciCQ11tmZV+O@mail.gmail.com>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Ubuntu 10.04 (lucid)
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 01:47:28 -0000

On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 07:09:55PM -0500,
 Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> wrote 
 a message of 117 lines which said:

> The average monthly wage in China is $153.
> 
> So quite a few people are carrying equipment that costs several
> times what some of the hotel staff earn in a year.

Which means that "security" checks by hotel staff is a bad idea. After
all, everyone involved in security knows that the real problems are on
the internal side of the firewall...