Planned experiment: A new mailing list for last-call discussions
Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Thu, 12 September 2019 16:14 UTC
Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56F1E120137 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 09:14:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.922
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.922 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.026, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6PDueK4GZ6Hu for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 09:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-f46.google.com (mail-io1-f46.google.com [209.85.166.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74FC1120131 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 09:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-f46.google.com with SMTP id j4so56074243iog.11 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 09:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=T7YSIcWxfh/mYtorA+cCHYMNpUEHmJ5DlYOv6SKFB30=; b=ncHH8qdGO5dPW5iIU1MDzfehg7ZxtyUZqJ4ZE7Eu8nzXuMkdxWj1YBJ726Qb1r6MYO RMzS9Yb5ZRTbHySF0DNkH56Scbk6u4qmabmhnAqsu7xq7mS2sKmDx8jAJFkwuZaoylaJ FFHLPQl0W0xnRMuGDZ8yt11wz3sIKuJ4wSwTKbFtOWWoB4i2J9Ec3ZOJlDWXV1kK8K7l eAWyRhm0WulBiXcYfVtyOGotHBqQtuABk58as9h/uO276eZFA+RYCy9J9E+piUBC80bW AIca+2WC1DA5w8CsmLfqzc2BvBHYx6vM3wf4MvkvEcsYKEXP5PUM4Oj7Q48v8H01hrGk 471g==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWH1wlI7e7pFD6D8neXEIxt8tpjb9n9f7x9/cPqxYaLHq4+4NvR 4nJ5wihjVYjQVtx0D3qWZDK3ZaAUgqh+5Wl3wbTijJ7J
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz6kKLhXltifmVJh5Z/hBk7aNwSiE4W0Jm6EeyDPXkIJhTHfGV9OROJI/qAv6NFChOpadC0WzFsBcvZdWHvums=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:7709:: with SMTP id n9mr4700184iom.187.1568304853412; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 09:14:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 12:14:01 -0400
Message-ID: <CALaySJKvdoy9MtzHMwq-Ew-EJoUs0V8t+y01FL-E5r3xdyRemQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for last-call discussions
To: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/LiB_dlvv3ZFlTF8hGp7GbGngqSg>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 16:14:16 -0000
As we discussed in the plenary session at IETF 105 in Montréal, some community members have suggested moving document last-call discussions onto a dedicated "last-call" mailing list, and off of the general <ietf@ietf.org> list. The latter is a high-volume list with a lot of varied discussion, and some think that it would be useful to separate the general discussion from the last-call discussion, to allow people to choose which discussions (or both) to follow. In the IETF 105 plenary, support was expressed for that separation. The IESG agrees, and wants to try an experiment to that end. We propose to create <last-call@ietf.org> and to direct last-call comments and discussions there (the last-call announcements would still go to <ietf-announce@ietf.org>, with "reply-to" set to the new list). That list would be monitored by volunteers recruited by the IETF Chair, and digressions would be nudged back to <ietf@ietf.org>, while we would ask people having last-call discussions on this list to please move them to the new list. We would get the tools team involved so that the distribution lists for directorate and review-team reviews would be updated appropriately. Our plan is to create the new list and pre-subscribe everyone who is subscribed to <ietf@ietf.org> at that time. Of course, anyone could unsubscribe to either or both lists immediately or later, but we think that doing it this way would minimize the likelihood that people would miss important stuff because of the move, and folks can choose what they prefer from there. After six months, we would do an initial evaluation, including getting feedback from the community, to see how the experiment is working. If it seems worth continuing we would do so, and at a point that the community decides that the experiment is a success (should it so decide), we would start an update to BCP 45 to formally move the location for last-call discussions, and we would update the 2007 IESG Statement on Last Call Guidance. We invite comments, here, on this plan, by the end of September. As I say above, we've heard support from the community for the general idea, and we'd like to make sure this direction is what the community wants. Barry, for the IESG
- Planned experiment: A new mailing list for last-c… Barry Leiba
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Eric Rescorla
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Ross Finlayson
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Barry Leiba
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Richard Barnes
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Tim Chown
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Barry Leiba
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Tim Wattenberg
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Barry Leiba
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Randy Bush
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Christopher Wood
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Tommy Pauly
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… John C Klensin
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Rob Sayre
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Barry Leiba
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Bob Hinden
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Eric Rescorla
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Barry Leiba
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… S Moonesamy
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… John C Klensin
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Barry Leiba
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… John C Klensin
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Pete Resnick
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… S Moonesamy
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Barry Leiba
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… S Moonesamy
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Barry Leiba
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Eric Rescorla
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Melinda Shore
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Eric Rescorla
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Melinda Shore
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Keith Moore
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Eric Rescorla
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Eliot Lear
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… avri doria
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Eric Rescorla
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Eliot Lear
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… John C Klensin
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Barry Leiba
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Julian Reschke
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Melinda Shore
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… John C Klensin
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… John C Klensin
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Keith Moore
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Rob Sayre
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Pete Resnick
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… John C Klensin
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Rob Sayre
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… John Levine
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Rob Sayre
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… tom petch
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Paul Wouters
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Robert Sparks
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Keith Moore
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Jared Mauch
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… tom petch
- RE: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… 7riw77
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… tom petch