Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy
Scott Bradner <sob@sobco.com> Mon, 14 June 2021 10:40 UTC
Return-Path: <sob@sobco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A8723A1F66 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 03:40:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.918
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.918 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 33THbHsG-tXK for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 03:40:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sobco.sobco.com (173-166-5-71-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.5.71]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F4483A1F63 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 03:40:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (golem.sobco.com [136.248.127.162]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 994D867D092; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 06:40:44 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.100.0.2.22\))
Subject: Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy
From: Scott Bradner <sob@sobco.com>
In-Reply-To: <213D80FFD9AAFBF587A61DF9@JcK-HP5>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 06:40:43 -0400
Cc: Aqua Q Glass <aquaqglass@gmail.com>, IETF list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <7BD3A219-7493-426B-8FDE-4845B895BC92@sobco.com>
References: <2BF6EC60-8B32-4171-B236-D9D038B3135B@yahoo.co.uk> <20210611174521.CD568F22E4A@ary.qy> <20210611182604.GA36947@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <ff6d912d-b0c6-4550-8d16-a79348e45699@dogfood.fastmail.com> <CAKKJt-enK4XmMuapke9LX-3TVuyg9j12zS9RyWXqvOT6Vbk5Mw@mail.gmail.com> <7606DFCE59EA95E72625E0FF@PSB> <26cf60f0-a007-a53f-f386-069526c31be4@cs.tcd.ie> <BB343401F7F2798A7EC7D196@JcK-HP5> <CAMppmAcXCxWGOwUzKMEt8bOtJuioxLUVB+HBYWjcycJanhX-Yw@mail.gmail.com> <213D80FFD9AAFBF587A61DF9@JcK-HP5>
To: "John C. Klensin" <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.100.0.2.22)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/LjQMSccr38tf5LJFZITFN5Wry_c>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 10:40:50 -0000
+1 > On Jun 13, 2021, at 7:37 PM, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> wrote: > > > > --On Sunday, 13 June, 2021 13:10 -0700 Aqua Q Glass > <aquaqglass@gmail.com> wrote: > >> a metadata ammendment towards the [RFC,documents] which >> supersede prior art, as denoted and approved with new >> documents, will provide hypertext and dedupe questions.. and >> additionally a place for IETF to maintain FAQs around >> relatable RFCs, online vs. adhoc email, and with authenticity. > > It turns out to be not quite that easy, especially if one tries > to avoid making other significant changes. This is, however, > exactly the territory that NEWTRK [1] starting about 2004 and > running through 2006 or so, with periodic attempts to restart or > build on that work. > > While I believe that, after nearly 15 years, it is time to look > at these questions again, I don't believe anyone who was heavily > involved in that original effort would recommend initiating a > follow-up effort (or a completely new one with similar goals) > unless it was clear that the IESG was prepared to accept and > process whatever conclusions and consensus that WG managed to > reach. > > Happy reading. > john > > > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/newtrk/about/ > > >
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy Salz, Rich
- Proposed ietf.org email address policy IETF Chair
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy Fred Baker
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy John C Klensin
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy Keith Moore
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy Lloyd W
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy John C Klensin
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy Michael Richardson
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy John Levine
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy Toerless Eckert
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy Bron Gondwana
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy Michael Richardson
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy John C Klensin
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy Michael Richardson
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy Stephen Farrell
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy Carsten Bormann
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy John C Klensin
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy Aqua Q Glass
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy ned+ietf
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy John C Klensin
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy John C Klensin
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy Adam Roach
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy Carsten Bormann
- RE: Proposed ietf.org email address policy Larry Masinter
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy Scott Bradner
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy Spencer Dawkins at IETF