Re: Adding IPv10 to the IETF 98 Agenda.

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Tue, 07 March 2017 16:00 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE46B1295F0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 08:00:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=yitter.info header.b=Ok7UKcNq; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=yitter.info header.b=WGgrDK7L
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id reCaApTeoKA6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 07:59:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.yitter.info (mx4.yitter.info [159.203.56.111]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49AD61295D2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 07:59:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA993BE4B8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 15:58:45 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yitter.info; s=default; t=1488902325; bh=HMrUZkiYTRO2iiUyU/xmwjDMCqG95VnKd8i3QQfQ8a0=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Ok7UKcNqdl0VlpbK2okqQi+zfiR1LxjEASZfi36swL/KXzHKdSTVNGMJfkhu9I2qy KezF1nXH4//WbOkkmaRlnFf9cyRnieLjguJ49eDkg5Ubc/aASpJrynU4h2AV5klGfv kStATpyPTBLLYJfrwROPICsridoVtUwtWRStRTtM=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at crankycanuck.ca
Received: from mx4.yitter.info ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx4.yitter.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DkGl8r3LHPaD for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 15:58:44 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 10:58:42 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yitter.info; s=default; t=1488902324; bh=HMrUZkiYTRO2iiUyU/xmwjDMCqG95VnKd8i3QQfQ8a0=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=WGgrDK7LCQSCbS47HiHUxMxQyt8g9j6HIh7vd9ri8z3LL4trknnREN88ohYfw9LlK wMNTCI/OhMqu2rttQcJ26Ia5swGLVeo15fYbdfLoEwNBqBWlkDjZLOIbGnmYDmOn1O /oFcoZrpSPssYF/iNS9LqkVw/ey/6G7rc9RrXssE=
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Adding IPv10 to the IETF 98 Agenda.
Message-ID: <20170307155842.GG13753@mx4.yitter.info>
References: <HE1PR04MB1449B0672C109C5C2A6AC52CBD2C0@HE1PR04MB1449.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> <20170307090849.jyl7fqqbn3icjw7a@nic.fr> <CAMm+LwgJg39CFKvxNNPkwC4XUCWPtrSAxTtce34p11UC8E+NyQ@mail.gmail.com> <18ee4435-726b-f054-e90b-419409197c11@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <18ee4435-726b-f054-e90b-419409197c11@gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Lm8NE5oGai7d7AgFIgRPF6Xt0UM>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 16:00:02 -0000

On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 03:42:57PM +0000, Stewart Bryant wrote:
> It might be interesting to have a wild ideas slot in the form of a series of
> 10 mins
> talks.

That sounds like a lightning-talks session.  I wonder whether the
plenary would be a good venue for that, or whether that would be too
large an audience?  We might not have to do it every time, but perhaps
this is a suggestion for the IAB technical plenary program to
consider.  What do people think?

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com