RE: [IAOC] ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration
"Eastlake III Donald-LDE008" <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com> Tue, 27 May 2008 14:56 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83FF53A68A2; Tue, 27 May 2008 07:56:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91AF43A6890; Tue, 27 May 2008 07:56:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.547
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.547 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.051, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1ARJvmV6zXrU; Tue, 27 May 2008 07:56:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail128.messagelabs.com (mail128.messagelabs.com [216.82.250.131]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E5DF3A68A2; Tue, 27 May 2008 07:56:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-13.tower-128.messagelabs.com!1211900186!7324861!1
X-StarScan-Version: 5.5.12.14.2; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [129.188.136.8]
Received: (qmail 6396 invoked from network); 27 May 2008 14:56:26 -0000
Received: from motgate8.mot.com (HELO motgate8.mot.com) (129.188.136.8) by server-13.tower-128.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 27 May 2008 14:56:26 -0000
Received: from il06exr02.mot.com (il06exr02.mot.com [129.188.137.132]) by motgate8.mot.com (8.12.11/Motorola) with ESMTP id m4REuKQL023252; Tue, 27 May 2008 07:56:25 -0700 (MST)
Received: from il06vts01.mot.com (il06vts01.mot.com [129.188.137.141]) by il06exr02.mot.com (8.13.1/Vontu) with SMTP id m4REuJha003073; Tue, 27 May 2008 09:56:19 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from de01exm64.ds.mot.com (de01exm64.am.mot.com [10.176.8.15]) by il06exr02.mot.com (8.13.1/8.13.0) with ESMTP id m4REuIBj003061; Tue, 27 May 2008 09:56:19 -0500 (CDT)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: RE: [IAOC] ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 10:56:17 -0400
Message-ID: <3870C46029D1F945B1472F170D2D979003D50213@de01exm64.ds.mot.com>
In-Reply-To: <5D1A7985295922448D5550C94DE2918001F64020@DEEXC1U01.de.lucent.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [IAOC] ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration
thread-index: Aci7cZYO0+1fIPReQHa3pUpy1VNzNwEcsM3wAAjDeDA=
References: <48346149.8040603@isoc.org><p06250105c45a15074413@[75.145.176.242]><48346B97.8090804@isoc.org> <5D1A7985295922448D5550C94DE2918001F64020@DEEXC1U01.de.lucent.com>
From: Eastlake III Donald-LDE008 <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com>
To: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: IAOC <iaoc@ietf.org>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0289024108=="
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
It's not "rather than". The issues are orthogonal. The reasons for getting an ISSN have been posted. ISBNs for individual RFCs is a separate issue that would not be affected by getting an ISSN for the series. Donald ________________________________ From: wgchairs-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:wgchairs-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of DRAGE, Keith (Keith) Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 9:17 AM To: Ray Pelletier; Pete Resnick Cc: Working Group Chairs; RFC Editor; IAB; IETF Discussion; IAOC Subject: RE: [IAOC] ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Can you explain why you are suggesting using an ISSN for the whole series, rather than ISBN for individual RFCs. regards Keith ________________________________ From: wgchairs-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:wgchairs-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ray Pelletier Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 7:36 PM To: Pete Resnick Cc: Working Group Chairs; IAB; IETF Discussion; IAOC; RFC Editor Subject: Re: [IAOC] ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Pete Resnick wrote: On 5/21/08 at 1:52 PM -0400, Ray Pelletier wrote: The Trust believes there are advantages to indentifying the RFC Series with an ISSN. OK, maybe I'm getting suspicious in my (still slowly) advancing years: Nowhere in the message did I see words like, "The Trust has consulted with lawyers/doctors/priests/old-crusty-IETFers and have found no disadvantages to identifying the RFC Series with an ISSN." The Trust did consult with lawyers, old-crusty-IETFers, RFC Editor, and found no disadvantages to indentifying the RFC Series with an ISSN. Did the Trust actually find no potential problems (in which case it would be nice to hear that), have they not looked into it yet, or did they find problems and you're not saying because you don't want to have a big public discussion (in which case you're being dopey, because it's gonna happen anyway)? That we know! (For the record, had you said that the Trust did in fact consult the tea leaves and everything looked on the up-and-up and they were simply confirming this with the community, I would have immediately said, "Fine with me." I'm happy to have people to whom such things can be delegated, but I do want to hear the words "We've done our due diligence.") We've done our due diligence, but we respect the community and the process, and seek its guidance. Ray pr
_______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Ray Pelletier
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration eburger
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Melinda Shore
- RE: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration David Harrington
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Randy Presuhn
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Pete Resnick
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Melinda Shore
- Re: [IAOC] ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Ray Pelletier
- Re: [IAOC] ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Pete Resnick
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Paul Hoffman
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Steve Crocker
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Dave Crocker
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration TS Glassey
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Melinda Shore
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Julian Reschke
- RE: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- RE: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Dave Cridland
- RE: [IAOC] ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Richard Shockey
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Brian E Carpenter
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Melinda Shore
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration John Levine
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Frank Ellermann
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Eric Rescorla
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Brian E Carpenter
- RE: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Ed Juskevicius
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Bill Manning
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Bill Manning
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration John C Klensin
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration John C Klensin
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration John C Klensin
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Tom.Petch
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Melinda Shore
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration John C Klensin
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Marshall Eubanks
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Melinda Shore
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Steve Crocker
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration John C Klensin
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Marshall Eubanks
- RE: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Ed Juskevicius
- RE: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration John C Klensin
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Marshall Eubanks
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration John C Klensin
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Bill Manning
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Nevil Brownlee
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration John C Klensin
- RE: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration John C Klensin
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration John C Klensin
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Cullen Jennings
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Bob Braden
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Frank Ellermann
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration John C Klensin
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Marshall Eubanks
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Stephane Bortzmeyer
- RE: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Marshall Eubanks
- RE: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [IAOC] ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Marshall Eubanks
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Marshall Eubanks
- Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Frank Ellermann
- RE: [IAOC] ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- RE: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration Glen Zorn