Re: archives (was The other parts of the report....

Paul Hoffman / VPNC <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Sat, 11 September 2004 21:17 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA11273; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 17:17:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C6FJq-0007vI-RD; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 17:22:06 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C6F7Q-00087Y-Tf; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 17:09:12 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C6F5d-0007Yf-E6 for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 17:07:21 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA10555 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 17:07:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from above.proper.com ([208.184.76.39]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C6F9y-0007gb-90 for ietf@ietf.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 17:11:51 -0400
Received: from [10.20.30.249] (dsl2-63-249-109-252.cruzio.com [63.249.109.252]) (authenticated bits=0) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i8BL7Bl5027302 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 14:07:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sender: phoffvpnc@mail.vpnc.org
Message-Id: <p06110412bd69191e540f@[10.20.30.249]>
In-Reply-To: <20040911204303.24E7C8947F@newdev.harvard.edu>
References: <20040911204303.24E7C8947F@newdev.harvard.edu>
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 14:07:14 -0700
To: ietf@ietf.org
From: Paul Hoffman / VPNC <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7aefe408d50e9c7c47615841cb314bed
Subject: Re: archives (was The other parts of the report....
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 68c8cc8a64a9d0402e43b8eee9fc4199

Is this re-flogging a good use of our time right now? "The other 
parts of the report" seem much more important than this. Maybe we can 
defer this until we know who/what/how/why the future of the IETF 
administration is.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf