Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <> Wed, 05 April 2017 09:55 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 084E2129432 for <>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 02:55:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.989
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.989 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, LOTS_OF_MONEY=0.001, T_MONEY_PERCENT=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key); domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Js_CohZbKdrU for <>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 02:55:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCB3F1201F8 for <>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 02:55:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple;; s=MDaemon; t=1491386124; x=1491990924; q=dns/txt; h=DomainKey-Signature: Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To:CC:Message-ID: Thread-Topic:References:In-Reply-To:Mime-version:Content-type: Content-transfer-encoding:Reply-To; bh=sqrAk9FDJpgDXDBEFtmIpgmW+ LDXIA2FAZHzyQ3Ztcw=; b=HfJYrgmdfPVV9sInN9VUS75STMEBfIacF9oyBZfjL ttV0fEmLxygJJNhRrnYpAZaTjQsqT6bZ204r/obU5x+O6wr5xYVwRmwpWp1u+ahv /1iU8bHhlwd0CB59dRPwxUU8fMFCZNmDvzHssbObvlnaHBFWW8hukDWF1A5/G0j0 bg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=MDaemon;; c=simple; q=dns; h=from:message-id; b=fANRv2eXxUKQoIsAICprHfL5sfr2Td5qOMI4DBHed4K3Mpj2xV8Rfoq0+an8 /mr1Zs8rA5LW6PUSdSL9deCOFReDAQNH/PuyhOG2ZCbZYPfl5w9EUdP56 tDqSjxhvwLwFZEqp2FqQmldQNNXG+AX0gEKPkgadKQnP6a6fZQlC38=;
X-MDAV-Processed:, Wed, 05 Apr 2017 11:55:24 +0200
X-Spam-Processed:, Wed, 05 Apr 2017 11:55:23 +0200
Received: from [] by (MDaemon PRO v11.0.3) with ESMTP id md50005402865.msg for <>; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 11:55:22 +0200
X-MDOP-RefID: re=0.000,fgs=0 (_st=1 _vt=0 _iwf=0)
X-HashCash: 1:20:170405:md50005402865::KudKBjjCkqJxrVKQ:00001UCj
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.20.0.170309
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 11:55:21 +0200
Subject: Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities
To: IETF <>
CC: <>
Message-ID: <>
Thread-Topic: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities
References: <> <> <> <> <20170404181505.GA4004@localhost> <> <20170404202446.GB4004@localhost> <> <> <> <20170404221042.GC4004@localhost> <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 09:55:28 -0000

Agree, but we should have the figures to make a right and balanced decision, right?

Is not the same if it cost 100.000 USD than 10.000 or 200.000 for each of those meetings …, despite the risk of having 50% of the participants not attending, which in terms of just “money” (not saying is the only thing that matters), 550 participants (half of regular attendance) means 440.000 USD at 800 USD registration fee.

Regarding UK, yeah, I should have said Schengen, I think somebody else already mention that point before.


-----Mensaje original-----
De: ietf <> en nombre de Dick Franks <>
Responder a: <>
Fecha: miércoles, 5 de abril de 2017, 11:46
Para: Jordi Palet Martinez <>
CC: IETF <>rg>, <>
Asunto: Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities

    On 5 April 2017 at 09:25, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <> wrote:
    One important question here, same as we had in the case of Singapore.
    If we cancel San Francisco, how much that is going to cost to the IETF for each of two planned meetings?
    3) However, for already contracted meetings, if this is going to cost IETF thousands of dollars, we can’t afford that.
    If the entire foreign contingent votes with its feet and stays home, strikes me that IETF can't afford that either.
    And further to your earlier remark:
    The UK is, and will remain, a part of the EU until March 2019 in accordance with Lisbon Treaty, Article 50.
    PS  The Treaty of Utrecht has no equivalent of Article 50.

IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.