IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Alternative decision process in RTCWeb

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Thu, 28 November 2013 17:50 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B4F01ADF48 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 09:50:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v7fJ2Fi2GZfD for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 09:50:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pd0-x22e.google.com (mail-pd0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C1D01ADEC4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 09:50:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pd0-f174.google.com with SMTP id y13so12293726pdi.5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 09:50:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WUwvW3bgt9Cc5mb37USnqU5rMsN1nTqyM6D2Rp62T54=; b=vgJmPYgV8ArXxLrvm+UyfuB4UkH0LdZ7JgpzP2bJ6K2PZf3BASRLwS3ZN5Rp8kWMqg eSFtMtOCW+WzPGcplhMwB0qwK0Bb8B4RE+gvhGlkxBoOERGHRpStTVGNT8HA6Ju8jDHf LonpJna+8YUdFwSPGdXcjslsDHEPQxQCi6iy8CqcD6Hg7A1A31T8xZEdW513tM0yktSj lNGfp0DL0DQmcQAuC0GRWVavBO0UcETYTXA2NHN8xzDQaFtd+ATh6fiODG4LnhcNggQe 5PQlOCi+nTp7iUdh9OOw+GjvisWKBPEVQ4Fd5xSps7fUkiFoRcJ78XrIBEOSg09pxuJM PUvQ==
X-Received: by 10.68.66.33 with SMTP id c1mr11936859pbt.73.1385661019701; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 09:50:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from spandex.local (216-67-70-82-rb3.nwc.dsl.dynamic.acsalaska.net. [216.67.70.82]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id gv10sm4792523pbd.0.2013.11.28.09.50.17 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 28 Nov 2013 09:50:18 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52978257.1090103@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 08:50:15 -0900
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Alternative decision process in RTCWeb
References: <52970A36.5010503@ericsson.com> <529719D7.9020109@cisco.com> <CAKHUCzxjwMXzy6=9WdRPRRCunKsLm9JFuo6JavMtEC7Tbov8TQ@mail.gmail.com> <DDE4643D-62CD-4B12-B1BF-176A5AA4CED9@standardstrack.com>
In-Reply-To: <DDE4643D-62CD-4B12-B1BF-176A5AA4CED9@standardstrack.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 17:50:23 -0000

On 11/28/13 2:29 AM, Eric Burger wrote:
> More to the point, if the WG cannot come to IETF consensus, that
> itself is sufficient to let the IESG know the WG (a bunch of close
> experts) is not *READY* to select a single codec. If the WG is not
> *READY* to pick a single codec, neither is the IETF.

This strikes me as precisely the issue.  If there's no
consensus there's no consensus.

Melinda

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email